[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#348468: marked as done (RFA: apmd -- utilities for advanced power management)



Your message dated Mon, 30 Jan 2006 04:17:06 -0800
with message-id <E1F3Xxy-0000Bm-8E@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#348468: fixed in apmd 3.2.2-5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2006 05:31:40 +0000
>From cph@csail.mit.edu Mon Jan 16 21:31:40 2006
Return-path: <cph@csail.mit.edu>
Received: from rozz.csail.mit.edu ([128.30.2.16] ident=mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EyjRU-0001VH-GM
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:40 -0800
Received: from c-24-61-30-248.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.61.30.248] helo=kleph.csail.mit.edu)
	by rozz.csail.mit.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.50)
	id 1EyjRT-0000h2-Ue
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:31:39 -0500
Received: from cph by kleph.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <cph@kleph.csail.mit.edu>)
	id 1EyjRT-00017t-Mj
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:31:39 -0500
From: Chris Hanson <cph@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org> 
Subject: RFA: apmd -- utilities for advanced power management
X-Debbugs-CC: Chris Hanson <cph@debian.org>
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1EyjRT-00017t-Mj@kleph.csail.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:31:39 -0500
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

All my current hardware is running ACPI, so I don't use this package,
and it's inconvenient for me to test it.

I'm willing to remain nominal maintainer if someone else will do the
work.  This will allow someone who is a non-DD to provide support.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 348468-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2006 12:20:17 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Mon Jan 30 04:20:17 2006
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F3Xxy-0000Bm-8E; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 04:17:06 -0800
From: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
To: 348468-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#348468: fixed in apmd 3.2.2-5
Message-Id: <E1F3Xxy-0000Bm-8E@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 04:17:06 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: apmd
Source-Version: 3.2.2-5

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
apmd, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

apmd_3.2.2-5.diff.gz
  to pool/main/a/apmd/apmd_3.2.2-5.diff.gz
apmd_3.2.2-5.dsc
  to pool/main/a/apmd/apmd_3.2.2-5.dsc
apmd_3.2.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apmd/apmd_3.2.2-5_i386.deb
libapm-dev_3.2.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apmd/libapm-dev_3.2.2-5_i386.deb
libapm1_3.2.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apmd/libapm1_3.2.2-5_i386.deb
xapm_3.2.2-5_i386.deb
  to pool/main/a/apmd/xapm_3.2.2-5_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 348468@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org> (supplier of updated apmd package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:11:07 +1100
Source: apmd
Binary: libapm-dev libapm1 xapm apmd
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.2.2-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
Changed-By: Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@debian.org>
Description: 
 apmd       - Utilities for Advanced Power Management (APM)
 libapm-dev - Library for interacting with APM driver in kernel
 libapm1    - Library for interacting with APM driver in kernel
 xapm       - X program to monitor APM battery status
Closes: 348468
Changes: 
 apmd (3.2.2-5) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer, closes: #348468.
   * Remove /etc/apm/suspend.d/99hwclock and /etc/apm/resume.d/00hwclock
     symlinks on purge. Patch by Colin Watson <cjwatson@ubuntu.com>.
   * Fix X header locations patch by LaMont Jones <lamont@ubuntu.com>.
Files: 
 b55b6e1c9272f184f374ba1a087e5807 634 admin optional apmd_3.2.2-5.dsc
 8d0d82ad91f3f89ed504719ec806ff33 28232 admin optional apmd_3.2.2-5.diff.gz
 b43d023671a4091f2dac4cd62bde2b19 58808 admin optional apmd_3.2.2-5_i386.deb
 bb1124b731628f5dfcbf2ec913182892 26370 x11 optional xapm_3.2.2-5_i386.deb
 f8be9bb05a23184781e59ffd472529d8 24512 libs optional libapm1_3.2.2-5_i386.deb
 77008aa47f3415509d1c3c478b65f1ee 24702 libdevel optional libapm-dev_3.2.2-5_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD3gK4ipBneRiAKDwRAtqaAJ0bQqA2xqSY6g4ZqsUH9PCdhQ07zwCgoSnH
xhNOfbtO6rRNzAW9X18jTo0=
=FE7f
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: