On Thu, Dec 21, 2006, Marcus Better wrote: > you mentioned that Subclipse is being packaged for Debian. Who is doing this? > I don't see an ITP other than the one I just filed for it. Yes, I've flagged your ITP because I wanted to tell you that someone else prepared packages. This was a while ago, and I suggested he goes with someone from the Debian Java team as a sponsor instead of me, but that I would be otherwise interested in sponsoring it. I'm attaching the relevant messages I sent. The ITP was #238733. Bye, -- Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org> "Forget your stupid theme park! I'm gonna make my own! With hookers! And blackjack! In fact, forget the theme park!" -- Bender
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Ivan Dubrov <wfragg@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: RFS: subclipse (bug #238733) and related
- From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 00:50:57 +0200
- Message-id: <20060617225057.GB19909@bee.dooz.org>
- In-reply-to: <20060617145618.GA31792@fragentoo>
- References: <20060617145618.GA31792@fragentoo>
Hi Ivan, On Sat, Jun 17, 2006, Ivan Dubrov wrote: > I'm looking for a sponsor for subclipse (ITP: #238733) and several related > packages (cdbs-eclipse is used for building the subclipse package itself and > other packages are libraries used by subclipse). All packages pass > lintian/linda check. Their licenses look DFSG-compliant to me. I'm interested in getting these packages in Debian as I use subclipse myself. However, would you receive a proposal from someone of the Debian Java team, it would be safest as I didn't package anything Java related for Debian yet. I should work on your packages if you don't get any offer from Debian Java folks in the next days. While we are at it: I'm rather picky and there are times where I can't sponsor packages during one or two weeks due to other work sources. I prefer warning you in advance. :) Now to subclipse: I see you took ownership of the subclipse ITP, but I didn't see ITPs for the other source packages you mention. I suggest you file ITPs just so that others don't start working on these. (Please contact me if you want me to be your sponsor.) Bye, -- Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Ivan Dubrov <wfragg@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: RFS: subclipse (bug #238733) and related
- From: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 22:52:58 +0200
- Message-id: <20060628205258.GA29185@bee.dooz.org>
- In-reply-to: <20060617225057.GB19909@bee.dooz.org>
- References: <20060617145618.GA31792@fragentoo> <20060617225057.GB19909@bee.dooz.org>
Hi Ivan, On Sun, Jun 18, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote: > I'm interested in getting these packages in Debian as I use subclipse > myself. However, would you receive a proposal from someone of the > Debian Java team, it would be safest as I didn't package anything Java > related for Debian yet. Since I didn't hear back from you, I suppose you found a sponsor in the Java team, correct? Bye, -- Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
- Subject: Re: RFS: subclipse (bug #238733) and related
- From: Ivan Dubrov <wfragg@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 08:45:51 +0700
- Message-id: <44A330CF.2080101@gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <20060628205258.GA29185@bee.dooz.org>
- References: <20060617145618.GA31792@fragentoo> <20060617225057.GB19909@bee.dooz.org> <20060628205258.GA29185@bee.dooz.org>
Loïc Minier wrote: > Hi Ivan, > > On Sun, Jun 18, 2006, Loïc Minier wrote: >> I'm interested in getting these packages in Debian as I use subclipse >> myself. However, would you receive a proposal from someone of the >> Debian Java team, it would be safest as I didn't package anything Java >> related for Debian yet. > > Since I didn't hear back from you, I suppose you found a sponsor in the > Java team, correct? > > Bye, Yes, I found the sponsor. -- WBR, Ivan S. DubrovAttachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---