[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#335007: marked as done (ITA: scalapack-doc -- Scalable Linear Algebra Package Documentation)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Dec 2006 20:47:04 +0000
with message-id <E1Gwlrc-000710-Mn@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#335007: fixed in scalapack-doc 1.5-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal

I do not work on HPC anymore and have therefore lost interest in
the package. It does not require much time as upstream changes
are rare. The package is bugfree.

It would make sense to adopt this package together with
scalapack (ScaLAPACK libraries), blacs-pvm and blacs-mpi (low
level libraries needed for ScaLAPACK).

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.6
Locale: LANG=de_CH@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_CH@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_CH)

-- 
Philipp      | work: philipp.frauenfelder@mailsp.com +41 1 802 20 00
Frauenfelder | home: philipp@frauenfelder-kuerner.ch +41 1 862 73 14
[PGP]        | http://www.frauenfelder-kuerner.ch/
Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux. See http://www.debian.org/

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: scalapack-doc
Source-Version: 1.5-10

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
scalapack-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

scalapack-doc_1.5-10.diff.gz
  to pool/main/s/scalapack-doc/scalapack-doc_1.5-10.diff.gz
scalapack-doc_1.5-10.dsc
  to pool/main/s/scalapack-doc/scalapack-doc_1.5-10.dsc
scalapack-doc_1.5-10_all.deb
  to pool/main/s/scalapack-doc/scalapack-doc_1.5-10_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 335007@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Muammar El Khatib <muammarelkhatib@gmail.com> (supplier of updated scalapack-doc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:30:01 -0400
Source: scalapack-doc
Binary: scalapack-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Muammar El Khatib <muammarelkhatib@gmail.com>
Changed-By: Muammar El Khatib <muammarelkhatib@gmail.com>
Description: 
 scalapack-doc - Scalable Linear Algebra Package Documentation
Closes: 335007
Changes: 
 scalapack-doc (1.5-10) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer (Closes: #335007)
   * Moved to debhelper v5.
   * Bumped standards version to 3.7.2
   * dh_installman instead of deprecated dh_installmanpages.
   * Build-Depends instead of Build-Depends-Indep into control file.
   * Changed to doc section. Linda doesn't complaint.
Files: 
 91a4d54976932afd1368ae0ed041ed57 591 doc optional scalapack-doc_1.5-10.dsc
 522997d0eda2315b98789a1a8270ea8a 46065 doc optional scalapack-doc_1.5-10.diff.gz
 db5815c22be9ef9e623a4984f60b7843 2702356 doc optional scalapack-doc_1.5-10_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFiEtIWLF0MZ2lytgRArjzAKDwxibrGZZW4Z8DG/LZmWNAr7M+JACeO4JA
+Y/NqkvEp0CelIplChBSe5c=
=urTn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: