[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#388363: reasons to keep it?



Hi,

from the package descriptions, feta and wajig seem to have the same features. 
Joe Wreschnig, the orphaning maintainer of feta is also it's upstream, so I 
wonder what reasons there are to keep feta in the archive?

Wouldn't removing it and adding a "conflicts: & provides: feta" (or 
"replaces"? it's too early on a sunday...) to wajig a sensible road to take? 
Or am I missing something?


regards,
	Holger


Attachment: pgpw1sg2njljK.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: