Your message dated Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:48:04 +0000 with message-id <200611241548.05070.rafael.rodriguez.tf@gmail.com> and subject line (no subject) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject:
- From: "Rafael Rodríguez" <rafael.rodriguez.tf@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 10:45:55 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 117f368d0611140245r39589568p75e74848f5a70c03@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <200611140726.21116.rafael.rodriguez.tf@gmail.com>
- References: <200611140726.21116.rafael.rodriguez.tf@gmail.com>
Subject: RFP: gspcav -- Generic Softwares Package for Camera Adaptator Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name : gspcav Version : 1.00.04 * URL : http://mxhaard.free.fr/index.html * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : Generic Softwares Package for Camera Adaptator, a kernel driver for up to 220 webcams gspcav is a kernel driver which supersedes old spca5xx kernel module. Currently it supports many USB camera chips (up to 220 webcams). -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.2 Locale: LANG=es_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=es_ES@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 398546-done@bugs.debian.org
- From: Rafael Rodríguez <rafael.rodriguez.tf@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:48:04 +0000
- Message-id: <200611241548.05070.rafael.rodriguez.tf@gmail.com>
Indeed a gspca-source package alredy exists... The misunderstanding comes from the upstream name being different than debian package... gspcav1 vs. gspca. Sorry!
--- End Message ---