Bug#378226: flickrfs_1.2.9-2_i386.changes REJECTED

[Alan Woodland <ajw05@aber.ac.uk>]

On 20 Nov 2006, at 11:40, Varun Hiremath wrote:

> Hello Alan,
>
> On 11/20/06, Alan Woodland <ajw05@aber.ac.uk> wrote: See: http:// 
> people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html
>
> Might also be worth asking on debian-legal@lists.debian.org
>
> I thought flickrfs was licensed under GPL v2 though?
>
> flickrfs is licensed under GPL v2 but flickrapi.py is licensed under
> Creative Commons license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/
That leaves several options then:

- Ask upstream to re-license flickrapi.py under some other more  
clearly DFSG license.
- Ask for clarification on the CC-by-2.5 licenses from debian-legal  
(the document I referred to earlier talks about 2.0)
- Split the source into a contrib package and a non-free package.

Any thoughts?
Alan