Re: Adam Cécile 2006-11-14 <[🔎] 20061114091255.CCFE54F4AF@hellscream.local> > * Package name : upstream I think that name is too generic, especially given that it is a common term in Debian language. Imagine a conversation like A: There is a bug in upstream. B: In upstream the package? A: Yes. B: In upstream the package or the upstream upstream? A: ?! I don't have a good suggestion, but maybe use "upstreamdev" like the website. Christoph -- cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature