[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#383401: marked as done (ITP: keytouch -- easily configure extra function keys in multimedia keyboards)

Your message dated Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:56:00 -0500
with message-id <20061025155600.GC2528@caribdis.nul-unu.com>
and subject line Keytouch has ben accepted to unstable.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <rodrigo@nul-unu.com>


* Package name    : keytouch
  Version         : 2.2.0
  Upstream Author : Marvin Raaijmakers <marvinr@users.sourceforge.net>
* URL             : http://keytouch.sourceforge.net/index.html
* License         : GPL
  Programming Lang: C
  Description     : easily configure extra function keys in multimedia keyboards

Kaytouch allows you to define, for every individual function key, what
to do if it is pressed.

KeyTouch version 2 is designed for Linux kernel 2.6 and is the first
program of its kind that perfectly works together with kernel 2.6.

----

Keytouch 2.1.4 is already packaged for Ubuntu. Said packaging will be
used as a starting point for the Debian package.

-- 
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975  2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Keytouch is now available in unstable.

-- 
Rodrigo Gallardo
GPG-Fingerprint: 7C81 E60C 442E 8FBC D975  2F49 0199 8318 ADC9 BC28

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: