[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#388200: marked as done (ITP: pax-utils -- ELF checking tool with focus on security relevant properties)

Your message dated Sun, 01 Oct 2006 05:09:37 -0700
with message-id <E1GU08X-000485-Jx@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#388200: fixed in pax-utils 0.1.13.dfsg.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Rémi Denis-Courmont" <rdenis@simphalempin.com>

* Package name    : pax-utils
  Version         : 0.1.13
  Upstream Author : Ned Ludd and Mike Frysinger
* URL             : http://www.gentoo.org/~solar/pax/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : ELF checking tool with focus on security relevant properties

 This is a small set of various PaX aware and related utilities for
 ELF binaries. It can check ELF binary files and running processes for
 issues that might be relevant when using ELF binaries along with PaX,
 such as non-PIC code or executable stack and heap.

 See also http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/pax-utils.xml for more
 details.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.13
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: pax-utils
Source-Version: 0.1.13.dfsg.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
pax-utils, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/p/pax-utils/pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz
pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1-1.dsc
  to pool/main/p/pax-utils/pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1-1.dsc
pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/p/pax-utils/pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb
pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/pax-utils/pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 388200@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Rémi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@simphalempin.com> (supplier of updated pax-utils package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 17:34:40 +0300
Source: pax-utils
Binary: pax-utils
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.13.dfsg.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rémi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@simphalempin.com>
Changed-By: Rémi Denis-Courmont <rdenis@simphalempin.com>
Description: 
 pax-utils  - Security-focused ELF files checking tool
Closes: 388200
Changes: 
 pax-utils (0.1.13.dfsg.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Debian package (Closes: #388200).
   * Remove original macho.h with Apple copyright but no license.
Files: 
 5b65103d0db5e4317a049fc8f3cf5f1e 623 misc extra pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1-1.dsc
 5399f9a9b2c71e423d516bf2fce4aaf7 61085 misc extra pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1.orig.tar.gz
 6fddadbbbcc445aef529e52382e4e124 2132 misc extra pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1-1.diff.gz
 773a1b87c3fbc5f91443fc9e5b1f511b 59166 misc extra pax-utils_0.1.13.dfsg.1-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFECuIOU3FkQ7XBOoRAuLEAJwKGYXRPJ9F+stQaFFietnXpU5YvgCePA0K
XKENMTiarcCgYpeysDb+k2o=
=0Fmb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: