> Hi > > There is a reason: > > http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/libpkg-guide.html#naminglibpkg Which says that the soname should be in the package name, thus libiec61883-0 as on debian-multimedia is correct and libiec61883 not. For the -dev package you could go with or without the zero in the package name... Bye
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part