[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#378445: ITP: gsf-sharp -- CLI bindings for libgsf



On So, 2006-07-30 at 11:20 +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> El dom, 30-07-2006 a las 01:38 +0200, Sebastian Dröge escribió:
> > > El dom, 16-07-2006 a las 16:22 +0200, Michael Koch escribió:
> > > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2006 at 02:13:52PM +0200, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> > > > > Package: wnpp
> > > > > Severity: wishlist
> > > > > Owner: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>
> > > > > 
> > > > > * Package name    : gsf-sharp
> > > > >   Version         : 0.7.0
> > > > >   Upstream Author : Martin Willemoes Hansen <mwh@sysrq.dk>
> > > > > * URL             : http://svn.myrealbox.com/source/trunk/gsf-sharp/
> > > > > * License         : LGPL
> > > > >   Programming Lang: C#
> > > > >   Description     : CLI bindings for libgsf
> > > > > 
> > > > >  A CLI library for reading and writing structured files (eg MS OLE and
> > > > >  Zip)
> > > > 
> > > > Why do you use the suffix '-sharp'? All other .Net related packages
> > > > in Debian seem tp use '-cil#'.
> > > 
> > >  I put there souce package name. Binary package name will be libgsf-cil
> > 
> > Hi,
> > the package should be called libgsf0.0-cil according to the CLI policy.
> 
>   Shouldn't it be 0.7? Perhaps I am a bit wrong, though.

The assembly version of gsf-sharp.dll is 0.0.0.7, thus major and minor
are 0 and 0 and the package should be called libgsf0.0-cil. :)

> > 
> > You might want to take the package from Ubuntu. IMHO there's nothing
> > that must be changed for Debian except debian/copyright which is
> > a bit vague for Debian standards.
> > 
> > http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/g/gsf-sharp/
> 
>  Damn, last time I checked it didn't comply with latest policy.

I updated it yesterday ;) If you already packaged it yourself maybe try
to merge the best parts of both :)

Bye

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: