On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 15:11 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > Yes, it is as people are thinking of removing translations from packages > due to size considerations and moving them to some sort of translation > packages, the same will probably be true for documentation translations. > Thus having one (or a couple of) Dutch translation package(s) instead of > translations in almost all packages... Ok, we can at least see whether it remains useful of course. Since there's no obvious other candidate for adopting it yet, I say we do it with team maintenance by l10n-dutch. However, I believe that it's a good idea (in general with any team maintained package) to make one person explicitly bear the final responsibility of the package. Who's in for that? As the maintainer of 'dutch' I can do it if that's required. Thijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part