Bug#374030: marked as done (ITA: libmail-verp-perl -- Variable Envelope Return)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Jun 2006 07:17:05 -0700
with message-id <E1FtPzV-0000Ev-Hw@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#374030: fixed in libmail-verp-perl 0.05-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I am putting libmail-verp-perl up for adoption. I packaged it because I
intended to use it on the PTS, but never finished that patch.
The package description is:
Mail::Verp provides utility functions to encode and decode Variable Envelope
Return Paths (VERP) addresses, as described by http://cr.yp.to/proto/verp.txt.
.
VERP addresses are used to help manage bounces coming back from remote SMTP
servers, especially when dispatching mail for a mailing-list; the VERP address
encodes the recipient address, which can then be recovered from the bounce to
unsubscribe the address from the mailing-list.
.
The encoding uses the method described by
http://www.courier-mta.org/draft-varshavchik-verp-smtpext.txt.
Thanks,
JB.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: libmail-verp-perl
Source-Version: 0.05-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libmail-verp-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libmail-verp-perl_0.05-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/libm/libmail-verp-perl/libmail-verp-perl_0.05-2.diff.gz
libmail-verp-perl_0.05-2.dsc
to pool/main/libm/libmail-verp-perl/libmail-verp-perl_0.05-2.dsc
libmail-verp-perl_0.05-2_all.deb
to pool/main/libm/libmail-verp-perl/libmail-verp-perl_0.05-2_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 374030@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
MartÃn Ferrari <martin.ferrari@gmail.com> (supplier of updated libmail-verp-perl package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:31:38 -0300
Source: libmail-verp-perl
Binary: libmail-verp-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.05-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: MartÃn Ferrari <martin.ferrari@gmail.com>
Changed-By: MartÃn Ferrari <martin.ferrari@gmail.com>
Description:
libmail-verp-perl - Variable Envelope Return Paths (VERP) address encoder/decoder
Closes: 374030
Changes:
libmail-verp-perl (0.05-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New maintainer. (Closes: #374030)
* debian/control:
+ Bumped Standards-Version to 3.7.2.
+ Fixed incorrect Build-Depends-Indep on debhelper.
* debian/copyright:
+ Incorrect package name and homepage.
* debian/rules:
+ Removed unused lines.
Files:
a804504074e21ab5e4df3f5a05ea5f85 643 perl optional libmail-verp-perl_0.05-2.dsc
4994e6139c813dc7d4e42116d3c581d9 1532 perl optional libmail-verp-perl_0.05-2.diff.gz
e6e91c60c59d7736aa6a4494c9c04951 8040 perl optional libmail-verp-perl_0.05-2_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEmqPRlAuUx1tI/64RAvJnAJ9Org0Ak8rD7jhNK/ArDdxkLRk0WACdFtR3
+wZjmprLgFBUUAIjtQyOW88=
=zcU6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: