Bug#317759: ITP not fulfilled
Damián Viano wrote:
> This ended up being a complex/useless package for many reasons.
> If 1 binary package is created then:
> * You have several sources
> * You have a lot of dependencies
> * Each script requires different handling/setup to work
I really don't see why this is complex or useless.
I agree this could be the best approach, to deliver one big package with
all dependencies covered and all the sources included. If each script
needs handling/setup, is there anything the user is not supposed to do?
I mean, the user configuration is obviously needed by such a tool.
> I would like to hear if someone have creative solutions to the
> problems stated and even would consider retaking the package. Meanwhile
> I'm dropping the ITP.
I really, really can't see the problem.
--
David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net> | http://www.damog.net/
<damog@debian.org> | GPG: C671257D
Esto va a ser como un dolor de muelas.
Reply to: