Le_Vert wrote:
How does this compare to paneld etc. included in the colo package?
Thiemo
It's seems CoLo is for mispel based cobalt only. Theses tools work on
all cobalt hardware.
So it guess it conflicts with colo because both would use the same
ressource (Colo manages boot menus via the panel LCD, this is AFAIK
fairly integrated in the boot loader part).
Is cobalt-panel-utils somehow superior to the utils in colo? IOW, makes
it sense to integrate parts of it in colo, or should it be a i386 only
package?
Thiemo