[CCing other maintainers doing flash-related stuff and people interested] On Sun, 2006-04-30 at 00:25 +0200, Jens Peter Secher wrote: > * Package name : haxe I see that you have not filed an ITP for neko, which is not in wnpp or in Debian. Do you intend to do so? I had intended to package neko in order to package haxe, but have been busy with NM and stuff. It seems that there is a reasonable amount of interest in osflash stuff in the debian community, but not much interest in debian packages in the osflash community. I think the debian interest warrants starting the TODO items on this page though: http://osflash.org/debian_packaging The way I see a pkg-flash project working is similar to pkg-perl - we keep the debian directories in SVN, have primary maintainer(s) for each package and welcome work by the whole group on all the packages. Here is pkg-perl's SVN docs: http://pkg-perl.alioth.debian.org/subversion.html I've just submitted a project registration request at alioth. About the mailing list, I would prefer it to be debian-flash@lists.debian.org. Until the project gets bigger, I think it can be used for discussion as well as in the maintainer address of packages, later on we can use an alioth list for the maintainer address. We probably will eventually write some kind of policy on common issues we might find - location of actionscript libraries and so on. Some wiki pages we should maintain as a group: http://wiki.debian.org/Flash http://wiki.debian.org/FlashPlayer http://wiki.debian.org/DebianFlash (not yet created) PS: Camille Harang and Miriam Ruiz - Just noticed you both are working on swfmill, it might be good to coordinate and merge your packaging effort. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part