Bug#352537: [Fwd: RFC/RFS: rosegarden4: music editor and MIDI/audio sequencer]
|--==> Junichi Uekawa writes:
JU> Anyway, there's going to be a 'rosegarden' and probably a
JU> compatibility 'rosegarden4' symlink.
JU> We can make rosegarden4 or rosegarden a dummy package, and
JU> use either one.
JU> rosegarden2 can be removed. It is a very different beast, and there
JU> might be users, but really, I don't think it's too good an idea to
JU> keep something that is only of an archaeological interest.
Yes, I agree. A the upstream source name is "rosegarden", for sake of
semplicity I'd set "rosegarden" as the new package name for the
bleeding-edge upstream, and turn "rosegarden4" into a pointer to
"rosegarden".
Free
Reply to: