[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#227054: Status of the package.



On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:24:34 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:24:37AM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
>> That would be ok if they are drop-in replacements, but otherwise you would
>> update an application on a users machine replacing it with one that might have
>> a completely different behaviour than the previous one, and that might not be
>> desired.
>
> OK.  I had not considered that.  I believe, in that case, your approach
> is more correct.

So, should iceme and icepref be removed?

Thanks,

Matej



Reply to: