Bug#227054: Status of the package.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:24:34 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:24:37AM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
>> That would be ok if they are drop-in replacements, but otherwise you would
>> update an application on a users machine replacing it with one that might have
>> a completely different behaviour than the previous one, and that might not be
>> desired.
>
> OK. I had not considered that. I believe, in that case, your approach
> is more correct.
So, should iceme and icepref be removed?
Thanks,
Matej
Reply to: