[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#338341: marked as done (ITP: ccbuild -- A C++ source scanning build utility)

Your message dated Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:53:38 +0100
with message-id <46c2f4ab0602150853u629335e0q747b9ee45e11801c@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line No willing sponsors found
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "A. Bram Neijt" <bneijt@gmail.com>


* Package name    : ccbuild
  Version         : 1.5.0
  Upstream Author : A. Bram Neijt <bneijt@gmail.com>
* URL             : https://sourceforge.net/projects/ccbuild
* License         : GPL-2
  Description     : A C++ source scanning build utility

 ccbuild is like a dynamic Makefile. ccbuild finds all programs
 in the current directory (containing "int main") and builds them.
 For this, it reads the C++ sources and looks at all local and global
 includes. All C++ files surrounding local includes are considered
 objects for the main program. The global includes lead to extra
 compiler arguments using a configuration file. Next to running g++
 it can create simple Makefiles, A-A-P files, and graph dependencies
 using DOT (graphviz) graphs.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12.5-k7-smp
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
No willing sponsors could be found.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: