[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#344456: marked as done (RFA: libsort-versions-perl -- Perl module for sorting of revision (and similar) numbers)

Your message dated Sat, 11 Feb 2006 04:47:23 -0800
with message-id <E1F7u9r-0003Nh-0e@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#344456: fixed in libsort-versions-perl 1.5-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal


IMVHO this package is in a pretty good shape, and I don't see any
particular tasks that really need to be done. However, for some reason
I'm not that fond of it and / or don't use it regularily anymore, so
as part of some restructuring on my side I'm willing to let this
package go and find a loving new maintainer for it.
NB: This package is quite easy to maintain and thus might be just the
right choice for any aspiring new maintainer trying to get his hands
wet.

If you have a sponsor (or don't need one) please just take over.
Otherwise I might be interested in sponsoring a new maintainer,
provided the changes a) show _no_ regressions and b) provide
substantial improvements (no, just putting your name on it and
changing to your packaging style of choice is _not_ substantial in my
eyes). Either way please follow the standard procedure as outlined on
<http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/> for taking over.
Until a new maintainer has been found I will continue to take care
just as before, of course...


$ apt-cache showsrc libsort-versions-perl
Package: libsort-versions-perl
Binary: libsort-versions-perl
Version: 1.5-2
Priority: optional
Section: perl
Maintainer: Florian Ernst <florian@debian.org>
Build-Depends-Indep: debhelper (>= 4.1.0), perl (>= 5.6.0-16), libtest-simple-perl
Architecture: all
Standards-Version: 3.6.2
Format: 1.0
Directory: pool/main/libs/libsort-versions-perl
Files:
 2da4199a2e8f4126d8e6dd6ef78dc292 657 libsort-versions-perl_1.5-2.dsc
 5434f948fdea6406851c77bebbd0ed19 4482 libsort-versions-perl_1.5.orig.tar.gz
 67d15f644ea3b6736ff4225ce1149953 2168 libsort-versions-perl_1.5-2.diff.gz


$ apt-cache show libsort-versions-perl
Package: libsort-versions-perl
Priority: optional
Section: perl
Installed-Size: 68
Maintainer: Florian Ernst <florian@debian.org>
Architecture: all
Version: 1.5-2
Depends: perl (>= 5.6.0-16)
Filename: pool/main/libs/libsort-versions-perl/libsort-versions-perl_1.5-2_all.deb
Size: 10000
MD5sum: 46ac366d3971a01590c9f109508d514b
Description: Perl module for sorting of revision (and similar) numbers
 This is the CPAN Perl module Sort::Versions.
 .
 This module allows easy sorting (via comparisons) of mixed text and numeric
 strings, similar to the complex "version numbers" that many revision control
 packages and shared library systems use. For an explanation of the
 algorithm, it's easiest to look at these examples:
 .
  1.1   <  1.2
  1.1a  <  1.2
  1.1   <  1.1.1
  1.1   <  1.1a
  1.1.a <  1.1a
  1     <  a
  a     <  b
  1     <  2
 .
  (special handling for leading zeros)
  0002  <  1
  1.06  <  1.5
 .
  (a hyphen binds looser than a period)
  1-1 < 1-2
  1-2 < 1.2
 .
 Homepage: http://search.cpan.org/~edavis/Sort-Versions-1.5/
Tag: devel::library, langdevel::perl, made-of::lang:perl


Cheers,
Flo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: libsort-versions-perl
Source-Version: 1.5-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libsort-versions-perl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libsort-versions-perl_1.5-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/libs/libsort-versions-perl/libsort-versions-perl_1.5-3.diff.gz
libsort-versions-perl_1.5-3.dsc
  to pool/main/libs/libsort-versions-perl/libsort-versions-perl_1.5-3.dsc
libsort-versions-perl_1.5-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/libs/libsort-versions-perl/libsort-versions-perl_1.5-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 344456@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Florian Ragwitz <rafl@debian.org> (supplier of updated libsort-versions-perl package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:42:03 +0100
Source: libsort-versions-perl
Binary: libsort-versions-perl
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Florian Ragwitz <rafl@debian.org>
Changed-By: Florian Ragwitz <rafl@debian.org>
Description: 
 libsort-versions-perl - Perl module for sorting of revision (and similar) numbers
Closes: 344456
Changes: 
 libsort-versions-perl (1.5-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer (Closes: #344456).
   * Moved all build-dep-indep packages to build-dep if they are needed in the
     clean target.
   * Removed build-dependency to libtest-simple-perl. It's a core module.
Files: 
 a9ff70b7fbc7efa5a6c2a728fcfde68b 649 perl optional libsort-versions-perl_1.5-3.dsc
 9e1c3116f27885fd95f40a08cba53497 2343 perl optional libsort-versions-perl_1.5-3.diff.gz
 9737bdaaef733726963f0acea33db75c 10166 perl optional libsort-versions-perl_1.5-3_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD7PFidC8qQo5jWl4RAiAgAJ4jwz08qGcFdbnekfAItJyfdmrhAQCggIFp
MxXl+M7g63ZoyeVuaKVnQQU=
=mxRD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: