Bug#316770: marked as done (ITA: robotour -- control mobile robots in this programmer's game)
Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:47:09 -0800
with message-id <E1F2T0P-0007GG-9y@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#316770: fixed in robotour 3.2.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jul 2005 18:40:00 +0000
>From sjackman@gmail.com Sun Jul 03 11:40:00 2005
Return-path: <sjackman@gmail.com>
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dp9Nn-00073u-00; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:40:00 -0700
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so549764rne
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
b=mJiUW79qM9SaY+ulM27Dqze53bKAokx54xJ7LOQIwOqtwE7QLgyXCXOS91Oyu3yZAkMQJMtN5zFpK/UIRhmDiNSPwg8DZKhqpDqeGZkVfTeAnQQzJQoFuxZLt8wmP6ORAjFb6MEwKTh+bHEKEGSmrF2omYTK2VzrEslgxjC6oCY=
Received: by 10.11.116.49 with SMTP id o49mr37723cwc;
Sun, 03 Jul 2005 11:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.11.99.15 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 11:39:58 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7f45d939050703113925c00f70@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 11:39:58 -0700
From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Shaun Jackman <sjackman@gmail.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFA: robotour - control mobile robots in this programmer's game
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I no longer play robotour, and so this package needs a new maintainer.
It currently has one bug related to building on amd64.
Cheers,
Shaun
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 316770-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2006 12:50:20 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Fri Jan 27 04:50:20 2006
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1F2T0P-0007GG-9y; Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:47:09 -0800
From: zakame@spunge.org (Zak B. Elep)
To: 316770-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#316770: fixed in robotour 3.2.1-1
Message-Id: <E1F2T0P-0007GG-9y@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:47:09 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: robotour
Source-Version: 3.2.1-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
robotour, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
robotour_3.2.1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/robotour/robotour_3.2.1-1.diff.gz
robotour_3.2.1-1.dsc
to pool/main/r/robotour/robotour_3.2.1-1.dsc
robotour_3.2.1-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/robotour/robotour_3.2.1-1_i386.deb
robotour_3.2.1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/robotour/robotour_3.2.1.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 316770@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Zak B. Elep <zakame@spunge.org> (supplier of updated robotour package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:55:09 +0800
Source: robotour
Binary: robotour
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.2.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Zak B. Elep <zakame@spunge.org>
Changed-By: Zak B. Elep <zakame@spunge.org>
Description:
robotour - control mobile robots in this programmer's game
Closes: 316770
Changes:
robotour (3.2.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* New maintainer. (Closes: #316770)
* debian/rules:
- Use cdbs + debhelper.
* debian/control:
- Add homepage to package description.
- Adjust B-D on wxgtk to use libwxgtk2.6-dev, and on cdbs.
- Adjust B-D on debhelper to (>= 4.1.46) per cdbs recommendation.
* debian/docs:
- Add AUTHORS.
* Add debian/doc-base and debian/dirs to install HTML help properly.
* Add debian/TODO to note work to be done for kickbot, robotop,
and makehtml.
* debian/patches:
- Add 10_64bit_support.patch from Matej Vela.
- Add 11_robotour_man_update.patch from Matej Vela.
- Add 20_autotools_update.patch using AM_MAINTAINER_MODE.
Files:
2e88c139dec59c5e1b65c5b7056a9cab 638 games optional robotour_3.2.1-1.dsc
300a39adec0372fdd0219db9a75ceacf 723782 games optional robotour_3.2.1.orig.tar.gz
04f9bf3443c2173f75807e125ec90af2 11079 games optional robotour_3.2.1-1.diff.gz
df31b3d0a2b91ccdce2875c0c3059804 809620 games optional robotour_3.2.1-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD2SyfdC8qQo5jWl4RArqPAJwJK663k8cGK6RAbdHw5OhIbD9DLwCcCWWn
ds6bGU77B/IrhQM6S3zti1Y=
=B5IH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: