[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#290836: marked as done (RFP: fwp -- fight win prevail - a multiplayer first person shooter)



Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:59:31 -0700
with message-id <E1F1TO7-0005sJ-UK@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 02:09:13 +0000
>From pellegrini@mpcnet.com.br Sun Jan 16 18:09:13 2005
Return-path: <pellegrini@mpcnet.com.br>
Received: from li7-90.members.linode.com (randomnode.info) [64.62.231.90] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CqMKP-0003jY-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:09:13 -0800
Received: from localhost.randomnode.info (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by randomnode.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8733642384
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:09:11 -0200 (BRST)
Received: from 127.0.0.1
	by localhost.randomnode.info (amavisd-lite) with LMTP id 1105927747-20902-1
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon Jan 17 00:09:11 2005
Received: from socrates.dnsalias.org (200-171-244-12.customer.telesp.net.br [200.171.244.12])
	by randomnode.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B524237E;
	Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:09:05 -0200 (BRST)
Received: by socrates.dnsalias.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id B80EB4BAF; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:09:00 -0200 (BRST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jeronimo Pellegrini <pellegrini@mpcnet.com.br>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: fwp -- fight win prevail - a multiplayer first person shooter
Reply-To: Jeronimo Pellegrini <pellegrini@mpcnet.com.br>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 00:09:00 -0200
Message-Id: <20050117020900.B80EB4BAF@socrates.dnsalias.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-lite at localhost.randomnode.info
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : fwp
  Version         : 0.0.5
  Upstream Author : The FWP-Team
* URL             : http://fightwinprevail.sourceforge.net
* License         : ZLIB licence
  Description     : fight win prevail - a multiplayer first person shooter

The game is set in an imaginary universe where pilots meet in special
arenas to fight to the death with their vehicles.

Gameplay lies somewhere in the middle of the Mechwarrior-series and
Quake 3. It is faster and more action-orientated than the first, but
tries to avoid the 
'jump-around-like-crazy-and-fire-at-everything-that-moves'-gameplay
known from Quake 3.

Fight Win Prevail is a pure multiplayer game and does not have a real
singleplayer mode. Although the target are LANs, the game should be
playable over the internet as well. 


==

The game is still alpha, but is already playable and very nice. There
are some wound files that probably can't be redistributed (but they
don't seem to be used anyway).


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (100, 'unstable'), (9, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-bk12
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=ISO-8859-1 (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 290836-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2006 18:59:32 +0000
>From damog@merkel.debian.org Tue Jan 24 10:59:32 2006
Return-path: <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org ([192.25.206.16] ident=Debian-exim)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F1TO8-0000dM-Hx
	for 290836-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:59:32 -0800
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1F1TO7-0005sJ-UK
	for 290836-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:59:31 -0700
To: 290836-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <E1F1TO7-0005sJ-UK@merkel.debian.org>
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:59:31 -0700
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.

As this is an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 290836
thanks bts

Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
290836@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>.
 



Reply to: