Bug#304530: marked as done (ITP: havp -- proxy with a clamav antivirus scanner)
Your message dated Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:32:55 -0800
with message-id <E1EzMnP-0003vP-Su@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#304530: fixed in havp 0.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Apr 2005 20:21:19 +0000
>From patrick.steiner@gmx.ch Wed Apr 13 13:21:19 2005
Return-path: <patrick.steiner@gmx.ch>
Received: from mxout.hispeed.ch (smtp.hispeed.ch) [62.2.95.247]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DLoMQ-0007g4-00; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:21:18 -0700
Received: from mybag.homeip.net (80-218-72-5.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.218.72.5])
(authenticated bits=0)
by smtp.hispeed.ch (8.12.6/8.12.6/tornado-1.0) with ESMTP id j3DKLGtf015001
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:21:16 +0200
Received: by mybag.homeip.net (Postfix, from userid 0)
id 4BF2617131; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:21:16 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Patrick Steiner <patrick.steiner@gmx.ch>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: Havp -- HAVP (HTTP Anti-Virus Proxy) is a proxy with a clamav antivirus
scanner.
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 22:21:16 +0200
Message-Id: <20050413202116.4BF2617131@mybag.homeip.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on smtp-07.tornado.cablecom.ch
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : Havp
Version : 0.56
Upstream Author : patrick.steiner@gmx.ch
* URL : http://www.server-side.de/
* License : GPL
Description : HAVP (HTTP Anti-Virus Proxy) is a proxy with a clamav antivirus scanner.
(Include the long description here.)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
HAVP is a proxy with an anti-virus filter. It does not cache or filter
content. At the moment the complete traffic is scanned. A reason for
that is the chance of malicious code in nearly every filetypes e.g. HTML
(JavaScript) or Jpeg. I hope to stop especially dialer or browser
exploits. But writing a http Anti Virus Proxy is a dilemma! Hugh
downloads are a problem for virus scanning proxies. A Client should not
receive data which is unchecked by the virus scanner, but big download
must not timeout.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304530-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jan 2006 23:46:51 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Wed Jan 18 15:46:51 2006
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EzMnP-0003vP-Su; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:32:55 -0800
From: Rene Mayrhofer <rene.mayrhofer@gibraltar.at>
To: 304530-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#304530: fixed in havp 0.76-2
Message-Id: <E1EzMnP-0003vP-Su@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:32:55 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: havp
Source-Version: 0.76-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
havp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
havp_0.76-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/h/havp/havp_0.76-2.diff.gz
havp_0.76-2.dsc
to pool/main/h/havp/havp_0.76-2.dsc
havp_0.76-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/h/havp/havp_0.76-2_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 304530@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Rene Mayrhofer <rene.mayrhofer@gibraltar.at> (supplier of updated havp package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:34:57 +0000
Source: havp
Binary: havp
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.76-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Rene Mayrhofer <rene.mayrhofer@gibraltar.at>
Changed-By: Rene Mayrhofer <rene.mayrhofer@gibraltar.at>
Description:
havp - HTTP Anti Virus Proxy
Closes: 304530
Changes:
havp (0.76-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Corrected location of PID file in init script.
Since I forgot to duplicate this line in the last changelog entry (which
was the first upload to unstable), do it now:
Closes: #304530: RFP: havp -- HAVP (HTTP Anti-Virus Proxy) is a proxy
with a clamav antivirus scanner
Files:
99fbc92ce43c848d7953db375861cb3c 602 net optional havp_0.76-2.dsc
fc3b9c49add02d7492f278711d211db2 4198 net optional havp_0.76-2.diff.gz
fc203b531d70afd7448aa6e9cd0e18f7 64296 net optional havp_0.76-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDzrzXq7SPDcPCS94RAlY0AJ9cScvhNPEIivDtsw4EuB6quoDaHgCdEsuC
Va7Iv06WDIFkQthnpJrWg70=
=NieV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: