Bug#284030: debian packages for asymptote
On 2005-10-07 17:42:41 -0400 Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:28:47PM -0400, Hubert Chan wrote:
Thanks for your feedback. I've packaged 0.91, and incorporated some
of your suggestions.
Good, I feel it is in quite good shape (and incidently 0.91 catches
more user errors than 0.86). There are still a couple of things to
look at, but that does not look like blockers for an upload. Just
tell me if you'd like to make another pass before an official upload.
I've uploaded 0.91-2 to my web page. Thanks for your feedback.
I notice that you repacked the orig tarball. It is not necessary, you
just have to the rename the upstream one, the directory namechange is
not necessary.
Fixed. Apparently, I had forgotten to copy the orig tarball to the
right place, to tla-buildpackage built a new tarball for me.
The doc-base file still refers to the pdf.gz file (heck, lintian
should detect such things, as #196122 says - er, wait, linda does
catch it ;).
lintian and linda now. ;-)
There is still an install-doc snippet in prerm.
Fixed.
I am a bit concerned with the "checking for working fork... no"
message from configure. config.log shows the following, which reveals
a problem in the test itself, as expected. Looks like there are 2
problems: ...
Bug #332713, which I added you to the Cc: list of the original
submission (and in the process, inadvertantly dropped myself from the
Cc: list. Whoops). I didn't make any changes to configure, since it
doesn't seem to be hurting anything.
--
Hubert Chan <hubert@uhoreg.ca> - http://www.uhoreg.ca/
PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA
Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA
Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred.
Reply to: