[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Processed: Reopen



Re: David Moreno Garza in <[🔎] 1127769938.4526.23.camel@cerdita>
> Can you guys please elaborate on this and stop playing within the BTS?

Hi,

my reply got burried in the control message, sorry. Quoted below.

| [...]
| close 260680
| thanks
| 
| Hi Jari.
| 
| Please don't do that. The BTS is not your personal bookmark list. If
| you want to have that software in Debian, please retitle the Bug to
| ITP and package it yourself, apparently no one else is interested.
| 
| The alternative is to give at least an explanation when reopening the
| bug, why that software is useful, why you want it in Debian, and why
| _you_ do not package it yourself.
| 
| Thanks.

I still think that it's pointless to keep RFPs open indefinitely if
one has no personal interest in packaging the application himself.

If there is no one who picked up the RFP within one year, the RFP
should be closed, or you should package the thing. Everything else
doesn't make sense.

David, could you modify your script such that it requests submitters
to add a justification when reopening the RFP? I'd find that rather
useful.

Christoph
-- 
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: