Bug#264642: marked as done (RFP: friendly-arch-interface -- An Arch frontend designed for ease-of-use)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:28 -0600
with message-id <E1EIaKi-0006xw-00@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2004 18:50:39 +0000
>From eric@r40.bogomips.org Mon Aug 09 11:50:38 2004
Return-path: <eric@r40.bogomips.org>
Received: from 66-215-81-20.pas-dcbi.charterpipeline.net (r40.bogomips.org) [66.215.81.20]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuFEE-0001K5-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 11:50:38 -0700
Received: by r40.bogomips.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 61D602583; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:50:37 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eric Wong <eric@petta-tech.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: friendly-arch-interface -- An Arch frontend designed for ease-of-use
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 11:50:36 -0700
Message-Id: <20040809185037.61D602583@r40.bogomips.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : friendly-arch-interface
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Aaron Bentley <aaron.bentley@utoronto.ca>
* URL : http://sourcecontrol.net/~abentley/fai/
* License : GPL
Description : An Arch frontend designed for ease-of-use
Taken from it the upstream webpage:
Fai is a front-end to Arch, meant to make it easier to use, for both
newbies and experienced users. It's intended as the successor to aba.
It's more ambitious-- it has its own commands, and some of them work
differently from Arch commands. For example, fai get will:
* look up unknown archives
* register and mirror looked-up locations, using only the
* desired version
* hard-link to the revision library
All of the above steps are optional, and all prompts are
configurable.
Like aba, fai supports external commands, which are easy to
write, and can be written in any language. Additionally,
native commands can be written in Python.
Fai supports aliases for archives, versions, etc. Aliases
can be static, based on user definitions, or determined
automatically. Automatic aliases can be used to say "the
revision from June 25" or "the revision that modified a
particular line in a given file", and more. Native commands
use aliases automatically. To expand aliases in other
commands, you can prefix them with '^'.
Like raw or tlash, Fai has a shell mode, with command
completion and intelligent argument completion for native
commands. It can also be invoked from shell, like tla or
aba.
Fai is written in Python, using the PyArch binding. It is
licensed under the GPL
Note: I've expanded the package name acronym from 'fai' since it's also
the name of the Fully Automated Installation (which I also use and love,
so don't even think about taking it out of Debian :)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 264642-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:18:30 +0000
>From damog@merkel.debian.org Thu Sep 22 16:18:29 2005
Return-path: <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIaKi-0001oJ-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:18:28 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIaKi-0006xw-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:28 -0600
To: 264642-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <E1EIaKi-0006xw-00@merkel.debian.org>
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:28 -0600
Delivered-To: 264642-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 264642
thanks bts
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
264642@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* RFPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500
Reply to: