[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#272753: marked as done (RFP: sqlgrey -- Greylisting implementation for Postfix that uses SQL)



Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:31 -0600
with message-id <E1EIaKl-00071M-00@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2004 19:47:46 +0000
>From submit@bugs.debian.org Tue Sep 21 12:47:46 2004
Return-path: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Received: from hq.szn.dk (mx.szn.dk) [217.157.1.202] (rerexamu)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C9qc5-0007ux-00; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:47:45 -0700
Received: by mx.szn.dk (Postfix, from userid 1007)
	id 6B5833A631C; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:47:43 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Klaus Alexander Seistrup <debian-bugs@magnetic-ink.dk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
Subject: RFP: sqlgrey -- Greylisting implementation for Postfix that uses SQL
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.3
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 21:47:43 +0200
Message-Id: <20040921194743.6B5833A631C@mx.szn.dk>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : sqlgrey
  Version         : 1.1
  Upstream Author : Lionel Bouton <lionel{dash}dev{at}bouton{dot}name>
* URL             : http://sqlgrey.sf.net/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : Greylisting implementation for Postfix

SQLgrey is a postfix policy service implementing a greylisting policy.

SQLgrey is a fork of the postgrey greylisting service for Postfix.

SQLgrey is written in Perl and uses DBI to access an SQL database.

SQLgrey needs:

  * Perl,
  * DBI,
  * Net::Server::Multiplex,
  * MySQL, PostgreSQL or SQLite.

The main drawback of greylisting as it was done by postgrey was the
delaying of legit emails.

This is nearly solved by the auto-white-listing mechanisms built into
SQLgrey :

  * When a sender has been seen coming from a given IP address, it is
    automatically accepted when coming again from the same IP address.
  * When several senders from the same domain have been seen coming
    from the same IP address, senders from the same domain are accepted
    when coming from the same IP address.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.21
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=da_DK

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 272753-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:18:31 +0000
>From damog@merkel.debian.org Thu Sep 22 16:18:31 2005
Return-path: <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EIaKl-0001uQ-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:18:31 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EIaKl-00071M-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:31 -0600
To: 272753-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <E1EIaKl-00071M-00@merkel.debian.org>
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:18:31 -0600
Delivered-To: 272753-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 272753
thanks bts

Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
272753@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* RFPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.

A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500



Reply to: