Bug#220981: marked as done (RFP: gyach-enhanced -- GYach Enhanced in a greatly improved version of the original GYach. It is an unofficial 'fork' of the GYach project.)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:18 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025518.B49DF107BD7@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 01:16:20 +0000
>From minton@bminton.is-a-geek.net Sat Nov 15 19:16:19 2003
Return-path: <minton@bminton.is-a-geek.net>
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALBWV-0000RR-00; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 19:16:19 -0600
Received: from bminton.is-a-geek.net ([68.48.126.51])
by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP
id <2003111601161801300k54lce>; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 01:16:18 +0000
Received: from minton by bminton.is-a-geek.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1ALBWT-00056C-00; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 20:16:17 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Minton <bminton@efn.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: gyach-enhanced -- GYach Enhanced in a greatly improved version of the
original GYach. It is an unofficial 'fork' of the GYach project.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 20:16:17 -0500
Message-Id: <E1ALBWT-00056C-00@bminton.is-a-geek.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_90,HAS_PACKAGE,PGP_SIGNATURE
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
* Package name : gyach-enhanced
Version :
Upstream Author : Erica Andrews <PhrozenSmoke ['at'] yahoo.com>
* URL : http://phpaint.sourceforge.net/pyvoicechat/index_gyache.html
* License : GPL
Description : GYach Enhanced in a greatly improved version of the original GYach. It is an unofficial 'fork' of the GYach project.
(Include the long description here.)
The original version of GYach (http://www4.infi.net/~cpinkham/gyach/)
was written by Chris Pinkham. GYach Enhanced has voice chat support and
is designed to work with pY! Voice Chat. The ENHANCED version of GYach
includes many of the features one would expect to see on the Windows
Yahoo client, hopefully without the bugs. I liked original GYach over
all other Yahoo chat clients for Linux, but there were too many of
Yahoo's features missing. GYach enhanced is an attempt to give Linux
users many of the features you would have/see running the Windows Yahoo
client - hopefully, without duplicating the bugs and clumsy interface
of the Windows client and without treating the user like they are a
complete idiot. I loved GYach, but I got REALLY tired of connecting to
Yahoo chat rooms on Linux and constantly having to tell my friends "oh,
sorry, my program doesn't support that feature - wait, let me get on
Windows."
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bminton.is-a-geek.net 2.4.21+bjm #1 Mon Jun 30 01:20:47 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/ts/hcieIIFcDdHIRAmgPAJ4lg2qwMLk+ZlazugzUCxFs3j6CrgCg7RP8
df9i+UJYbOo6Xa9334BKxZM=
=dSmy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 220981-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:56:07 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:56:06 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFjuv-0001Sr-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:56:06 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B49DF107BD7; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:18 -0500 (CDT)
To: 220981-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025518.B49DF107BD7@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:18 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 220981-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 511
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
Reply to: