[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#141748: marked as done (RFP: openca -- Full featured opensource X.509 CA)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:05 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025505.96512107855@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Apr 2002 09:35:27 +0000
>From bam@snoopy.apana.org.au Mon Apr 08 04:35:27 2002
Return-path: <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
Received: from snoopy.apana.org.au [203.12.237.97] (postfix)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16uVYX-00022w-00; Mon, 08 Apr 2002 04:35:22 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 97CCA2ADD9; Mon,  8 Apr 2002 19:35:11 +1000 (EST)
Received: from scrooge.chocbit.org.au (scrooge.apana.org.au [203.12.237.100])
	by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B848E2AD54; Mon,  8 Apr 2002 19:35:10 +1000 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by scrooge.chocbit.org.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EAE77C47A; Mon,  8 Apr 2002 19:35:08 +1000 (EST)
Received: by scrooge.chocbit.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id 6F1D0C443; Mon,  8 Apr 2002 19:35:07 +1000 (EST)
From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.apana.org.au>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: openca -- Open Source Certification Authority
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.49
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 19:35:07 +1000
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <20020408093507.6F1D0C443@scrooge.chocbit.org.au>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020222
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020222
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2002-04-08
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : openca
  Version         : 0.8.1
  Upstream Author : Multiple; see website.
* URL             : http://www.OpenCA.org/
* License         : "Apache-style" license
  Description     : Open Source Certification Authority


openca allows for a two part CA (from docs):

1. Here it is how it works. The CA (2) Computer is the most important:
on it it is istalled the ca software and the CA SECRET KEY. Because
of it's security needs, we think it must be left disconnected by any
network (this is the only way to protect a computer from network
attacks(!!!)) and file tranfers (Requests/Certificates/CRLs/etc...)
with other computers get executed via removable support
( i.e. floppy/rw/etc...).

2. The RA Server is a bit more complicated. It has a secure (with client
auth turned on) apache server installed. Services offered only to RAs
permit to approve/reject requests BEFORE they get signed by the CA.
On the RA Server there is also an LDAP server (for certificates
availability).

3. There is another Web server (Secure Server) that is used by the
normal users to make certificate requests, import CA Certificate, import
requested certificates and import other users' certs. You can activate
this server on the same machine of the RA Server: this can save a litte
work and is the currently adopted choice.

Oh, sorry, did I say 2 parts? obviously, I still have some learning to
do myself...

There are currently some major problems with packaging it for
Debian, so this may take some time. For instance:

- requires openssl 0.9.7, which has not yet been released upstream.

- some system-specific data is hardcoded, which is obviously
a big no-no for a Debian package... Things like E-Mail address, URL,
and organisation have been hardcoded... Hopefully these
have been isolated to a few config files, not sure yet.

- since I I still learning how this works, the current
way I have split the packages could be considered restrictive.
(should be easy to change).

Any help appreciated; if you want to try it out
(with limitations described above), I have a copy at
<URL:http://snoopy.apana.org.au/~ftp/debian/>.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux scrooge 2.4.18 #1 Wed Apr 3 13:18:14 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 141748-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:19 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:19 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFjuB-0000W4-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:19 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 96512107855; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:05 -0500 (CDT)
To: 141748-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025505.96512107855@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:05 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 141748-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 93

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: