Bug#199692: marked as done (RFP: rfc-tool -- Tool to search in the RFCs and display them)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:15 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025515.22833107B84@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jul 2003 15:12:49 +0000
>From martin.quinson@tuxfamily.org Wed Jul 02 10:08:35 2003
Return-path: <martin.quinson@tuxfamily.org>
Received: from wifi247.wlan.ens-lyon.fr (localhost) [140.77.32.247]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19XjDn-0001Vj-00; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 10:08:35 -0500
Received: from mquinson by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19XjDj-0005LN-00; Wed, 02 Jul 2003 17:08:31 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: Martin Quinson <Martin.Quinson@tuxfamily.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: rfc-tool -- Tool to search in the RFCs and display them
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.16
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 17:08:31 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <E19XjDj-0005LN-00@localhost>
Sender: Martin Quinson <martin.quinson@tuxfamily.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-02
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : rfc-tool
Version : 3.2
Upstream Author : Derrick Daugherty <rfc@dewn.com>
* URL : http://www.dewn.com/rfc/
* License : Unclear, probably free
Description : Tool to search in the RFCs and display them
The Requests for Comments (RFCs) form a series of notes, started in 1969,
about the Internet (originally the ARPANET). The notes discuss many aspects
of computer communication, focusing on networking protocols, procedures,
programs, and concepts but also including meeting notes, opinion, and
sometimes humor. See RFC2026 (in package rfc-bcp) for more information.
.
This package contains a tool called rfc which can be used to search the
RFCs about a given port number, a given protocol, arbitrary text or even
perl regexps. If you have the rfc-* packages installed, it will search
there, but if not, it will connect to the internet to retrieve the RFC
index and work on it.
Please note that this description is not correct until my new version of
the rfc package gets uploaded to the archive. But I don't exepect the
rfc-tool to hit the archive before the data RFC packages.
Likewise, the licence for now is:
#############################################################################
# Feel free to redistribute as long as you keep this header in tact.
# http://www.dewn.com/rfc/
# Please let me know if you find this useful, I'd love to hear about it!
# rfc@dewn.com
#############################################################################
I contacted upstream to clarify it.
Lastly, for now, it will not search the locally installed RFC, and will
always download the RFC from the net. But I plan to fix this before the
package gets uploaded.
Thanks, Mt.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux galadriel 2.4.20 #1 dim mar 30 23:53:59 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 199692-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:53 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:53 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFjuj-00011J-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:53 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 22833107B84; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:15 -0500 (CDT)
To: 199692-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025515.22833107B84@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:15 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 199692-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 402
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
Reply to: