[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#172141: marked as done (RFP: pts -- Tetrinet Server Written in Perl)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:09 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025509.9D69E107832@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Dec 2002 17:44:34 +0000
>From teo@adala.org Sat Dec 07 11:44:34 2002
Return-path: <teo@adala.org>
Received: from 80-24-25-195.uc.nombres.ttd.es (periquito.sierpes48.es) [80.24.25.195] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18Kj0D-0003hr-00; Sat, 07 Dec 2002 11:44:33 -0600
Received: by periquito.sierpes48.es (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id A11D42B3C0; Sat,  7 Dec 2002 18:44:30 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2002 18:44:30 +0100
From: =?iso-8859-15?Q?Te=F3filo_Ruiz_Su=E1rez?= <teo@adala.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Cc: INOUE Kenji <deq@oct.zaq.ne.jp>
Subject: ITP: pts -- Tetrinet Server Written in Perl
Message-ID: <20021207174430.GA6782@adala.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AqsLC8rIMeq19msA"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.9
X-Operating-System: Linux periquito 2.4.19
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0
	tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
	      USER_AGENT_MUTT
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 


--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-07
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : pts
  Version         : 0.20
  Upstream Author : INOUE Kenji <deq@oct.zaq.ne.jp>
* URL             : http://ptns.sourceforge.net
* License         : GPL
  Description     : Tetrinet Server Written in Perl

 Perl TetriNET Server is a Tetrinet compatible server written in Perl.
 It supports channels, encrypted passwords, sudden death, game types
 and a bunch of other configurable parameters of gameplay.
  =20

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux periquito 2.4.19 #6 SMP lun oct 7 10:14:08 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=3Des_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=3Des_ES@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set)


--=20
Te=F3filo Ruiz Su=E1rez || teo@adala.org || Sevilla, Espa=F1a
--------------------------------------------------------
		Debian GNU/Linux 2.4.19		=09
--------------------------------------------------------
GnuPG Key ID: 420718E6
FPR:0280 862C 064B FA76 9A1C  EB64 5755 A66C 4207 18E6


--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE98jN+V1WmbEIHGOYRAi4sAJ9PBshi3MPNyruBsDFhf+3qQ3caVwCgtW7o
WGI6qi3NDp+/krm+iqYPmIo=
=a6eX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--AqsLC8rIMeq19msA--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 172141-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:33 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:33 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EFjuP-0000xT-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:33 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 9D69E107832; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:09 -0500 (CDT)
To: 172141-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025509.9D69E107832@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:09 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 172141-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 200

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
  clean up a bit the place.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 123456
thanks bts

Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).

A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500



Reply to: