[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#290799: marked as done (ITP: libspandsp -- Library which provides DSP functions for VoIP.)



Your message dated Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:07:02 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <20050612110702.33590DF94C@gimli.tribulaciones.org>
and subject line libspandsp already in archive
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2005 19:22:15 +0000
>From kk@verfaction.de Sun Jan 16 11:22:15 2005
Return-path: <kk@verfaction.de>
Received: from nyx.verfaction.de (mx.verfaction.de) [212.9.161.72] (Debian-exim)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CqFyZ-0004N5-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:22:15 -0800
Received: from kk by mx.verfaction.de with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CqFyU-0003wN-Pz; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:22:12 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Kilian Krause <kk@verfaction.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:22:10 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <E1CqFyU-0003wN-Pz@mx.verfaction.de>
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: kk@verfaction.de
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: ITP: libspandsp -- Library which provides DSP functions for VoIP.
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : libspandsp
  Version         : 0.0.2pre9
  Upstream Author : Steve Underwood <steveu@coppice.org>
* URL             : ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : Library which provides DSP functions for VoIP.

spandsp is a library which provides many of the DSP functions needed for
telephony. It is designed to be independent of the telephony platform
itself.

It's used by YATE and Asterisk do to Fax for example.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 290799-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jun 2005 11:07:08 +0000
>From jose@tribulaciones.org Sun Jun 12 04:07:08 2005
Return-path: <jose@tribulaciones.org>
Received: from 104.red-83-41-22.pooles.rima-tde.net (gimli.tribulaciones.org) [83.41.22.104] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DhQJ2-0002iW-00; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 04:07:08 -0700
Received: by gimli.tribulaciones.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 33590DF94C; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:07:02 +0200 (CEST)
To: 290799-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libspandsp already in archive
Message-Id: <20050612110702.33590DF94C@gimli.tribulaciones.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:07:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: jose@tribulaciones.org (Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo)
Delivered-To: 290799-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

libspandsp is already in the archive, so closing the bug

-- 
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
   jsogo@debian.org



Reply to: