[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#304652: marked as done (ITP: obby -- Network text editing library)



Your message dated Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:48:11 -0600
with message-id <20050608234811.GA21812@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line Experimental upload now in unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2005 13:45:13 +0000
>From pkern@debian.org Thu Apr 14 06:45:13 2005
Return-path: <pkern@debian.org>
Received: from focus.syskonzept.net [85.131.168.32] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DM4ef-0001y5-00; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:45:13 -0700
Received: from phil by focus.syskonzept.net with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DM4ed-0007Zx-0X
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:45:11 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: libobby -- Network text editing library
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:45:10 +0000
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, crew@0x539.de
Message-Id: <E1DM4ed-0007Zx-0X@focus.syskonzept.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>

* Package name    : libobby
  Version         : 0.1.0 (currently 0.0.20050410)
  Upstream Author : 0x539 dev group <crew@0x539.de>
* URL             : http://darcs.0x539.de/libobby/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : Network text editing library

libobby is a library which provides synced document buffers. It supports
multiple documents in one session. Thus it serves as the basis of a free
collaborative editor. It is portable to both Windows and Unix-like
platforms.

An own website for this project is not yet available. The repository is
browsable on <http://darcs.0x539.de/cgi-bin/darcs.cgi/libobby>.

This library depends on net6, for which an ITP is filed as #303811, and
is a direct dependency of gobby, a package which will be submitted as
another ITP bugreport within the next few weeks.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 304652-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Jun 2005 23:48:18 +0000
>From djpig@merkel.debian.org Wed Jun 08 16:48:18 2005
Return-path: <djpig@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DgAHS-0008Pd-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:48:18 -0700
Received: from djpig by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DgAHL-0005gB-00; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:48:11 -0600
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:48:11 -0600
To: 304652-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Experimental upload now in unstable
Message-ID: <20050608234811.GA21812@merkel.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@merkel.debian.org>
Delivered-To: 304652-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This WNPP bug was tagged "fixed-in-experimental", but the package has
since then moved to unstable.



Reply to: