[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#299754: marked as done (ITP: NanoBlogger -- small weblog engine for the UNIX command line)



Your message dated Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:09:39 -0500
with message-id <E1DFcCh-0005uA-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#299754: fixed in nanoblogger 3.1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 06:19:10 +0000
>From billy@billy.com.mx Tue Mar 15 22:19:10 2005
Return-path: <billy@billy.com.mx>
Received: from customer-201-133-79-211.prod-infinitum.com.mx (erita.billy.com.mx) [201.133.79.211] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DBRs5-00061X-00; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:19:09 -0800
Received: from billy by erita.billy.com.mx with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1DBRur-0001eq-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:22:01 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: William Vera <billy@billy.com.mx>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: NanoBlogger -- small weblog engine for the UNIX command line
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:22:01 -0600
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1DBRur-0001eq-00@erita.billy.com.mx>
Sender: William Vera <billy@erita.billy.com.mx>
X-BadReturnPath: billy@erita.billy.com.mx rewritten as billy@billy.com.mx
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: William Vera <billy@billy.com.mx>


* Package name    : NanoBlogger
  Version         : 3.1
  Upstream Author : Kevin Wood <un1xt3r@fastmail.fm>
  
* URL             : http://nanoblogger.sourceforge.net/
* License         : (GPL)
  Description     : small weblog engine for the UNIX command line

NanoBlogger is a small weblog engine written in Bash for the command
line. It uses common UNIX tools such as cat, grep and sed. It's free to
use and modify under the GNU General Public License.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-[Lab]
Locale: LANG=es_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=es_ES@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299754-close) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Mar 2005 18:30:27 +0000
>From joerg@newraff.debian.org Sun Mar 27 10:30:27 2005
Return-path: <joerg@newraff.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DFcWp-0000uz-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:30:27 -0800
Received: from joerg by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DFcCh-0005uA-00; Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:09:39 -0500
From: William Vera <billy@billy.com.mx>
To: 299754-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#299754: fixed in nanoblogger 3.1-1
Message-Id: <E1DFcCh-0005uA-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@newraff.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:09:39 -0500
Delivered-To: 299754-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: nanoblogger
Source-Version: 3.1-1

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nanoblogger, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

nanoblogger_3.1-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/n/nanoblogger/nanoblogger_3.1-1.diff.gz
nanoblogger_3.1-1.dsc
  to pool/main/n/nanoblogger/nanoblogger_3.1-1.dsc
nanoblogger_3.1-1_all.deb
  to pool/main/n/nanoblogger/nanoblogger_3.1-1_all.deb
nanoblogger_3.1.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/n/nanoblogger/nanoblogger_3.1.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 299754@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
William Vera <billy@billy.com.mx> (supplier of updated nanoblogger package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:01:19 -0600
Source: nanoblogger
Binary: nanoblogger
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: William Vera <billy@billy.com.mx>
Changed-By: William Vera <billy@billy.com.mx>
Description: 
 nanoblogger - small weblog engine for the UNIX command line
Closes: 299754
Changes: 
 nanoblogger (3.1-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Initial Release (Closes:#299754).
Files: 
 68b9c1640150de40166a50ebaadf5a95 572 web optional nanoblogger_3.1-1.dsc
 7b8eba52ded4849953c88f1747b97f9d 51293 web optional nanoblogger_3.1.orig.tar.gz
 45eac57980377dcf5e32e61cfd14141d 2921 web optional nanoblogger_3.1-1.diff.gz
 67a661f1a7f2eeb953a5226ad9f0da0e 50732 web optional nanoblogger_3.1-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCOmMmgY5NIXPNpFURAq8PAKCqmThrlvnF7RkbXcmCVcInAEHUgQCgsklG
DSNksvvoKZzqOv/taDJ6kHs=
=2m0t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: