On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 02:57:00PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 12:47:34AM +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I think ibcs is probably worth getting rid of: > > > > * orphaned (#279770) > > * only really relevant for 2.0 and 2.2 kernels it seems (linux-abi seems to > > replace it for more modern kernels) > > I agree. > > By the way, best is IMHO to also attach this kind of info to the > orphaned bug report, so that people looking for this kind of information > can find it. > > Pending removal from unstable, it's IMHO an idea to file a RC bug on the > package (reason: useless package not fit for release), and ask -release > to drop it from sarge. > Could someone with authority please reassign the WNPP bug to ftp.debian.org? regards Andrew -- linux.conf.au 2005 - http://linux.conf.au/ - Birthplace of Tux April 18th to 23rd - http://linux.conf.au/ - LINUX Canberra, Australia - http://linux.conf.au/ - Get bitten!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature