[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#289307: (no subject)



from murphy.debian.org (146.82.138.6) by mx3.gene6.net (192.168.1.133); Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:44:24 +0100
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP id A59E52DE2C; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:40:02 -0600 (CST)
Old-Return-Path: <seanius@seanius.net>
X-Original-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Received: from sativa.seanius.net (dsl092-235-113.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.235.113]) by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F132DD8E for <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:39:56 -0600 (CST)
Received: by sativa.seanius.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CAEEA15829; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:39:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:39:55 -0500
From: sean finney <seanius@debian.org>
To: Eric Lavarde <Eric.Lavarde@bawue.de>
Cc: 289307@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, Teemu Ikonen <tpikonen@pcu.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: pwc-source headed for unstable this weekend
Message-ID: <20050217203955.GA28458@seanius.net>
References: <20050217185301.GA27030@seanius.net> <4214F9AB.6080509@bawue.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4214F9AB.6080509@bawue.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Rc-Virus: 2005-02-17_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2005-02-11_01
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-lists.debian.org_2005_02_17_01  (2004-01-11) on murphy.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,LDOSUBSCRIBER  autolearn=no version=2.63-lists.debian.org_2005_02_17_01
X-Spam-Level: 
Resent-Message-ID: <f6vLlC.A.SW.iEQFCB@murphy>
Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/186978
X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-devel.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:40:02 -0600 (CST)

This is a multipart message in mime format.

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 09:08:11PM +0100, Eric Lavarde wrote:
> pwc: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.

i'm guessing that this has to do with how you compiled the module.
i don't get this message if i use "m-a build pwc-source" or the
appropriate --append-to-version flags with make-kpkg.  could
you provide a little more info?

> pwc: Unknown symbol video_devdata
=2E..

these symbols comes from videodev, which should be loaded automatically
before pwc as the pwc module lists it as a dependency.  strange...


something i really hadn't put much thought into is how this package
should handle the pre-existing pwc module found in 2.6.8 and earlier.
i guess a conditional diversion should be added?  i'll file a phony
rc bug against pwc to keep it out of sarge until this can be
handled properly.

	sean

--=20

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCFQEbynjLPm522B0RAjD7AJ4qib9wL0gftGvGXOxzZvk9w/9kcACdEJYr
gZwDzDhjF8N2VrwBGFUViuE=
=WogJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl--



Reply to: