Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > I intend to orphan the ctn package. > > The package description is: > DICOM is the standard for image storage, annotation, and networking. > It is used widely for medical imaging. > . > This package includes the binary and run-time configuration files for CTN. > . > The home page for CTN is http://www.erl.wustl.edu/DICOM/ctn.html. Hello Kevin, I'm working with DICOM myself (but not with this specific package), so I might be a candidate for taking over this package (and the corresponding ctn-doc). I'm not a DD (yet?) but already have some experience with packaging. However, I'm not sure about whether there's still an interest in the package. The last upstream version is from 2003, and there's not much bug-traffic about it (near to none). What do you think, it it still sensible for Debian to ship this package? Do you have a clue whether it's actually being used? On the other hand, since it has already been packaged and no critical bugs are open, currently the only thing needed is to "keep an eye" on the package, just in case any problems arise with it in the future. So if there's still some need for it, I'm willing to take over that function. Regards, Thijs Kinkhorst
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature