[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#297414: marked as done (O: cl-ubf -- Common Lisp Universal Binary Format Library)



Your message dated Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:33:15 -0500
with message-id <E1D6FvX-0001Un-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#297414: fixed in cl-ubf 0.2.1-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2005 19:06:17 +0000
>From kmr@debian.org Mon Feb 28 11:06:17 2005
Return-path: <kmr@debian.org>
Received: from (boa.b9.com) [216.184.11.2] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D5qDh-0000tc-00; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:06:17 -0800
Received: from tiger.med-info.com (tiger.med-info.com [216.184.11.129])
	by boa.b9.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with SMTP id j1SJ5kNw022953
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:05:46 -0700
Received: from tiger.med-info.com (kevin@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by tiger.med-info.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-7) with ESMTP id j1SJ5kQl001880
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:05:46 -0700
Received: (from kevin@localhost)
	by tiger.med-info.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j1SJ5kfj001877;
	Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:05:46 -0700
Message-Id: <200502281905.j1SJ5kfj001877@tiger.med-info.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: tiger.med-info.com: kevin set sender to kmr@debian.org using -f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Kevin M. Rosenberg" <kmr@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: O: cl-ubf -- Common Lisp Universal Binary Format Library
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:05:46 -0700
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 172.16.1.2
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal


I intend to orphan the cl-ubf package.

The package description is:
 This is an implementation of a UBF(A) (as specified by
 http://www.sics.se/~joe/ubf/site/ubfa.html) reader and writer. It is
 a library for Common Lisp programs.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 297414-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2005 22:39:51 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Tue Mar 01 14:39:51 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D6G1u-0003HJ-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:39:51 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D6FvX-0001Un-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:33:15 -0500
From: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org>
To: 297414-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#297414: fixed in cl-ubf 0.2.1-2
Message-Id: <E1D6FvX-0001Un-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 17:33:15 -0500
Delivered-To: 297414-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: cl-ubf
Source-Version: 0.2.1-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
cl-ubf, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

cl-ubf_0.2.1-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/cl-ubf/cl-ubf_0.2.1-2.diff.gz
cl-ubf_0.2.1-2.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cl-ubf/cl-ubf_0.2.1-2.dsc
cl-ubf_0.2.1-2_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/cl-ubf/cl-ubf_0.2.1-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 297414@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org> (supplier of updated cl-ubf package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  1 Mar 2005 10:19:57 +0100
Source: cl-ubf
Binary: cl-ubf
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.2.1-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org>
Changed-By: Peter Van Eynde <pvaneynd@debian.org>
Description: 
 cl-ubf     - Common Lisp Universal Binary Format Library
Closes: 297414
Changes: 
 cl-ubf (0.2.1-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer. (Closes: #297414: O: cl-ubf -- Common Lisp Universal
     Binary Format Library)
   * Adopted by Peter Van Eynde
Files: 
 0e43c43b7c2a9f0fd62a8a058938208a 567 devel optional cl-ubf_0.2.1-2.dsc
 7e48d640831f8a09648c185f13571b50 2705 devel optional cl-ubf_0.2.1-2.diff.gz
 ebb3ad99fcd69485f73d3385b98bd1d1 7050 devel optional cl-ubf_0.2.1-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCJNVD11ldN0tyliURAmlnAKCWzcnXvz+D+6wZHF783/wGBDE+KgCgqdrC
pZcc8kzhxbJP5BEkBdtG9Us=
=ykVb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: