[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#288379: VCG, license, and source location



Jens> How about putting the DFSG/GPL-compatible source on Savanna (or
Jens> similar), so that there is a (new) canonical place to get VCG.  Of
Jens> course, politely ask the original authors about their opinion
Jens> first.

Okay.

Ian> My indecision has only been reinforced by the thread below (which,
Ian> too, petered out in an ambiguous way):

>> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/01/msg00297.html

Jens> That thread talks about possible problems with the Common Public
Jens> License (CPL).  The conclusion seems to be that the CPL is OK.
Jens> Anyways, VCG is under GPL, so I fail to see the connection...?

The thread is about a particular package newly under CPL - graphviz.
graphviz can do many of the same things vcg can, and seems to be more
widely used.  And, after seeing the vcg source, graphviz is probably
easier to maintain <grin>

-- 
I wonder which is the best virus for unix and if I can write
a better one in Microsoft BASIC ?
Hans-Marc Olsen in comp.unix.programmer



Reply to: