Bug#308598: marked as done (ITP: gnumail-doc -- User guide for GNUMail)
Your message dated Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:50:46 -0800
with message-id <E1Ehamk-0002we-85@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#308598: fixed in gnumail-doc 1.0pre1-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 10:33:53 +0000
>From sengun@phys.ethz.ch Wed May 11 03:33:53 2005
Return-path: <sengun@phys.ethz.ch>
Received: from wiggis.ethz.ch [129.132.86.197] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVoXJ-0000av-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 03:33:53 -0700
Received: from wiggis2.ethz.ch (wiggis2.ethz.ch [192.168.127.3])
by wiggis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 01A5740F1; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:33:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [129.132.189.31] (bludger.ethz.ch [129.132.189.31])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by wiggis.ethz.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 43A6641E1; Wed, 11 May 2005 12:33:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4281DF8F.1070706@phys.ethz.ch>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:33:51 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCrkan_Seng=FCn?= <sengun@phys.ethz.ch>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414
X-Accept-Language: de-ch, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: ITP: gnumail-doc -- User guide for GNUMail
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at phys.ethz.ch
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : cenon-doc
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://gnustep.made-it.com/Guides/GNUmail.html
* License : Read on at the bottom*
Description : User guide for GNUMail
This package is an illustrated user guide for GNUMail.
* Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute this Guide and its
accompanying documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby
granted in perpetuity, provided that the above copyright notice and this
paragraph appear in all copies.
The copyright holders make no representation about the suitability of
this Guide for any purpose. It is provided "as is" without expressed or
implied warranty.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux ibook 2.4.23-ben1 #7 Sat Dec 27 11:20:38 CET 2003 ppc
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=POSIX
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308598-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2005 22:51:23 +0000
>From joerg@spohr.debian.org Wed Nov 30 14:51:23 2005
Return-path: <joerg@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ehamk-0002we-85; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:50:46 -0800
From: =?utf-8?b?R8O8cmthbiBTZW5nw7xu?= <gurkan@linuks.mine.nu>
To: 308598-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.31 $
Subject: Bug#308598: fixed in gnumail-doc 1.0pre1-1
Message-Id: <E1Ehamk-0002we-85@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:50:46 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: gnumail-doc
Source-Version: 1.0pre1-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnumail-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
gnumail-doc_1.0pre1-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/g/gnumail-doc/gnumail-doc_1.0pre1-1.diff.gz
gnumail-doc_1.0pre1-1.dsc
to pool/main/g/gnumail-doc/gnumail-doc_1.0pre1-1.dsc
gnumail-doc_1.0pre1-1_all.deb
to pool/main/g/gnumail-doc/gnumail-doc_1.0pre1-1_all.deb
gnumail-doc_1.0pre1.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/g/gnumail-doc/gnumail-doc_1.0pre1.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 308598@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gürkan Sengün <gurkan@linuks.mine.nu> (supplier of updated gnumail-doc package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:28:09 +0100
Source: gnumail-doc
Binary: gnumail-doc
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.0pre1-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Gürkan Sengün <gurkan@linuks.mine.nu>
Changed-By: Gürkan Sengün <gurkan@linuks.mine.nu>
Description:
gnumail-doc - GNUMail user guide
Closes: 308598
Changes:
gnumail-doc (1.0pre1-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Initial release. (Closes: #308598)
Files:
2a33ab2119ffb2f88d2e072004f3b7ab 590 doc optional gnumail-doc_1.0pre1-1.dsc
5cbc964f757f44affec58bab08614e6a 1017540 doc optional gnumail-doc_1.0pre1.orig.tar.gz
b75dac5ffd34191c93c3aeef77d495a5 1467 doc optional gnumail-doc_1.0pre1-1.diff.gz
5e56a8df42406d8ba3a5c02438b63254 1020918 doc optional gnumail-doc_1.0pre1-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDiwtuxa93SlhRC1oRAuy/AKCh6h2T1+3mP2NoEqiU20PVW07m4wCfQadY
hhgEt2IGKo5z8DYKgAm5VhA=
=xSXa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: