Bug#298381: progress
On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:15:35PM +0100, Mirco Bauer wrote:
Hi,
> > I'm interested in LAT in principle, but don't think it's ready to enter debian
> > ATM, while it misses SSL/TLS connection support, which I think is a really
> > important feature for a remote ldap manager...
>
> I agree with you, after I tested LAT a bit. Many parts are harcoded (the
> predefined user/group dialogs for example) and is without SSL not much
> useful, also it likes to crash.
> I was blended by the fact its version 0.7.x, thinking it's well
> developed already, I would say it's more like typical 0.2.x (beta
> stuff).
> So let's wait and see how it grows :)
>
Yeah, later on we can even comaintain it, if we both like it! :)
For now let's leave this bug open, and see...
Guido
Reply to: