Bug#330953: marked as done (RFA: rocks -- Make network sockets reliable in a transparent way)
Your message dated Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:44:10 +0200
with message-id <20051025124410.GB19388@sliepen.eu.org>
and subject line Bug#330953: I might be interested!
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Sep 2005 15:57:34 +0000
>From guus@debian.org Fri Sep 30 08:57:34 2005
Return-path: <guus@debian.org>
Received: from postduif.warande.net [145.97.193.212]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ELNGQ-0000LW-00; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:57:34 -0700
Received: from 214pc223.sshunet.nl (214pc223.sshunet.nl [145.97.223.214])
by postduif.warande.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696BC17B4A7;
Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:57:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from xar.sliepen.oi (guus@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xar.sliepen.oi (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8UFvXSa028285
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:57:33 +0200
Received: (from guus@localhost)
by xar.sliepen.oi (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8UFvX8l028284;
Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:57:33 +0200
Message-Id: <200509301557.j8UFvX8l028284@xar.sliepen.oi>
X-Authentication-Warning: xar.sliepen.oi: guus set sender to guus@debian.org using -f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFA: rocks -- Make network sockets reliable in a transparent way
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:57:33 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the rocks package.
The package description is:
Rocks protect sockets-based applications from network failures, particularly
failures common to mobile computing, including:
.
- Link failures (e.g., unexpected modem disconnection);
- IP address changes (e.g., laptop movement, DHCP lease expiry);
- Extended periods of disconnection (e.g., laptop suspension).
.
Rock-enabled programs continue to run after any of these events; their broken
connections recover automatically, without loss of in-flight data, when
connectivity returns. Rocks work transparently with most applications,
including SSH clients, X window applications, and network service daemons.
The current package does not work at all anymore (although it still
builds from source). Upstream told me more than a year ago they would
fix it, but nothing has happened since then. I also think there are not
many users of this package. If noone adopts it, I will ask for its
removal.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13-rc6
Locale: LANG=nl_NL, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 330953-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2005 12:47:06 +0000
>From guus@sliepen.eu.org Tue Oct 25 05:44:26 2005
Return-path: <guus@sliepen.eu.org>
Received: from postduif.warande.net [145.97.193.212]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EUOAD-0001KV-00; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 05:44:26 -0700
Received: from 163pc223.sshunet.nl (163pc223.sshunet.nl [145.97.223.163])
by postduif.warande.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0A417B4A7;
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:44:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from xar.sliepen.oi (guus@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by xar.sliepen.oi (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j9PCiAjP022587
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:44:10 +0200
Received: (from guus@localhost)
by xar.sliepen.oi (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j9PCiAic022586;
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:44:10 +0200
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:44:10 +0200
From: Guus Sliepen <guus@debian.org>
To: Torsten Schlabach <TSchlabach@gmx.net>,
330953-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#330953: I might be interested!
Message-ID: <20051025124410.GB19388@sliepen.eu.org>
References: <[🔎] 14141.1129996345@www7.gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 14141.1129996345@www7.gmx.net>
X-oi: oi
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: 330953-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 05:52:25PM +0200, Torsten Schlabach wrote:
> I might be interested to adopt the rocks package.
[...]
> What would I have to do to adopt the package?
Upload a new version with yourself as the maintainer :)
--=20
Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards,
Guus Sliepen <guus@sliepen.eu.org>
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDXiiZAxLow12M2nsRAtGZAJ4gWFnWddXPftODJOAZl+rnkyztwACfZoEO
yAnHov1NWrvwuNVmOAbY1YU=
=G8Ry
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW--
Reply to: