[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#277706: acknowledged by developer (WNPP bug closing)



reopen 277706
thanks

Package mentioned in the ITP is available since the day ITP was filed, and 
URL is inside ITP.
I've created it for use in a local project.

However, package was never uploaded to Debian. I'm still not a DD (NM 
process stalled for months at DAM approval stage), and I'm not sure 
package is needed by others and it worths time needed to keep it 
up-to-date.
I think it's better to keep things as-is (i.e opened ITP with an URL 
containing once created package), until somebody else will show some 
interest. At that point we may go on.

Nikita

> Hello,
>
> This is an automatic mail sent to close the ITP you have reported or
> are involved with.
>
> Your ITP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
> - It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
> - It hasn't had any activity recently.
>
> As this is an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
> wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
> intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
> example if the ITP is still of your interest, or there has been
> some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
> bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
> mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
> their bugs ;-).
>
> To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
> with a body text like this:
>
> reopen 277706
> thanks bts
>
> Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
> 277706@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
> Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
> the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
> you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
>
> A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
>
> Thanks for your cooperation,
>
>  -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>.

Attachment: pgpczooX6JN8J.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: