Bug#330677: marked as done (O: bonobo-activation)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:11:04 +0200
with message-id <1128064264.9116.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>
and subject line Invalid orphaning
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 08:18:48 +0000
>From lool@dooz.org Thu Sep 29 01:18:48 2005
Return-path: <lool@dooz.org>
Received: from pig.zood.org [194.242.112.24]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKtcu-0005VO-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 01:18:48 -0700
Received: by pig.zood.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B14094C0A1; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:18:47 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 10:18:47 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier <lool@dooz.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: O: bonobo-activation
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20050929081847.GA18323@bugs.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Debbugs-Cc: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>, debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
After some checks with the pkg-gnome maintainers, and following the
discussions in debian-gtk-gnome and debian-release concerning the
status of GNOME 1, I'm orphaning a couple of GNOME 1 packages.
If you're interested in adopting this package, please take contact with
Thomas Bushnell (which is in copy) since he suggested he might adopt
the packages.
Bye,
--=20
Lo=EFc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 330677-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Sep 2005 07:10:53 +0000
>From ondrej@sury.org Fri Sep 30 00:10:53 2005
Return-path: <ondrej@sury.org>
Received: from mail.active24.cz [81.95.104.4]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ELF2i-0001Mc-00; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:10:53 -0700
Received: from maple.active24.cz (maple.office.active24.cz [81.95.104.250])
by mail.active24.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB7328000AF
for <330677-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:16:39 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Invalid orphaning
From: Ondrej Sury <ondrej@sury.org>
To: 330677-done@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vwLPrmxYqwtPruyPw74C"
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 09:11:04 +0200
Message-Id: <1128064264.9116.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.0
Delivered-To: 330677-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--=-vwLPrmxYqwtPruyPw74C
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
bonobo-activation is GNOME2 package and it was not meant to be orphaned.
Ondrej.
--=20
Ondrej Sury <ondrej@sury.org>
--=-vwLPrmxYqwtPruyPw74C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDPOUI9OZqfMIN8nMRAtBcAJ94T6ozRtEzsqyZN6YVVGQ/ONmtxQCfUAhh
XGiyjJYDwwH4VWR4Yx7bzec=
=Ksoh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-vwLPrmxYqwtPruyPw74C--
Reply to: