Bug#263008: marked as done (ITP: openwbem -- An open source implementation of DMTF CIM and WBEM system management standards.)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:46 -0600
with message-id <E1EIaK2-0006lI-00@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 17:08:34 +0000
>From rlewczuk@pronet.pl Mon Aug 02 10:08:34 2004
Return-path: <rlewczuk@pronet.pl>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BrgIc-0006Gd-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 10:08:34 -0700
Received: from ([172.16.63.206]) [217.168.193.69]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BrgIZ-0005zN-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 12:08:32 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Rafal Lewczuk <rlewczuk@pronet.pl>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: openwbem -- An open source implementation of DMTF CIM and WBEM system
management standards.
Bcc: Rafal Lewczuk <rlewczuk@pronet.pl>
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 19:07:58 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <E1BrgIZ-0005zN-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : openwbem
Version : 3.0.2
Upstream Author : Vintela Inc. <support@vintela.com> and others.
* URL : http://openwbem.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Description : An open source implementation of DMTF system management standards.
(RLE) An excerpt from README:
OpenWBEM is a set of software components that help facilitate the
deployment of the DMTF's (Distributed Management Task Force) CIM/WBEM
technologies. If you are not familiar with the DMTF and it's technologies,
you might want to visit their web site at http://www.dmtf.org.
This software was initially developed by Caldera International and
released to the opensource community under a BSD style license for further
maturation and additional platform support. On initial release, all of the
software components were written in C++. We expect this to change as the project
evolves and developers add more components to the suite.
(RLE) This is a part of my effort of adding WBEM capabilities to Debian.
As OpenWBEM implements only a bare framework (say, 'core'), there are
more software packages needed to create a functional WBEM system
management solution, notably sblim* packages and some WBEM clients.
Currently I have a proof-of-concept solution consisting of openwbem
CIMOM server, three sets of management provider plugins and a simple
WBEM client. However, it still lacks many of debian policy requirements:
a Debian-compliant version of all packages will be available soon (I
hope :)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-ca9100
Locale: LANG=pl_PL, LC_CTYPE=pl_PL (ignored: LC_ALL set to pl_PL)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 263008-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:17:47 +0000
>From damog@merkel.debian.org Thu Sep 22 16:17:47 2005
Return-path: <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIaK3-0000z1-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:17:47 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EIaK2-0006lI-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:46 -0600
To: 263008-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <E1EIaK2-0006lI-00@merkel.debian.org>
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:46 -0600
Delivered-To: 263008-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the ITP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your ITP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the ITP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 263008
thanks bts
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
263008@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* ITPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500
Reply to: