[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#195948: marked as done (ITP: dspam -- advanced Bayesian anti-spam local delivery agent)



Your message dated Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:44 -0600
with message-id <E1EIaK0-0006jE-00@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Jun 2003 15:38:09 +0000
>From jijo@lawin.leathercollection.ph Tue Jun 03 10:38:08 2003
Return-path: <jijo@lawin.leathercollection.ph>
Received: from gusi.leathercollection.ph [202.163.192.10] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19NDrO-00081S-00; Tue, 03 Jun 2003 10:38:02 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gusi.leathercollection.ph (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADC0EB4A02
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 23:37:57 +0800 (PHT)
Received: from lawin.leathercollection.ph (lawin.leathercollection.ph [192.168.0.2])
	by gusi.leathercollection.ph (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 393B6EB4A00; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 23:37:54 +0800 (PHT)
Received: by lawin.leathercollection.ph (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 3C5331A4064; Tue,  3 Jun 2003 23:37:05 +0800 (PHT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Federico Sevilla III <jijo@free.net.ph>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: RFP: dspam -- advanced Bayesian anti-spam local delivery agent
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 23:37:05 +0800
Message-Id: <20030603153705.3C5331A4064@lawin.leathercollection.ph>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-06-03
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : dspam
  Version         : 2.6.0.65
  Upstream Author : Network Dweebs Corporation <jonathan@networkdweebs.com>
* URL             : http://www.networkdweebs.com/software/dspam/
* License         : GPL
  Description     : advanced Bayesian anti-spam local delivery agent

DSPAM (as in De-Spam) is an open-source project to create a new kind of
anti-spam mechanism, and is currently effective as both a server-side
agent for UNIX email servers and a developer's library for mail clients,
other anti-spam tools, and similar projects requiring drop-in spam
filtering.

The DSPAM agent masquerades as the email server's local delivery agent
and filters/learns spams using an advanced Bayesian statistical approach
(based on Baye's theorem of combined probabilities) which provides an
administratively maintenance-free, easy-learning Anti-Spam service
custom tailored to each individual user's behavior. Advanced because on
top of standard Bayesian filtering is also incorporated the use of
Chained Tokens, de-obfuscation, and other enhancements. DSPAM works
great with Sendmail and Exim, and should work well with any other MTA
that supports an external local delivery agent (postfix, qmail, etc.)


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 211159-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Sep 2005 23:17:45 +0000
>From damog@merkel.debian.org Thu Sep 22 16:17:45 2005
Return-path: <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [192.25.206.16] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EIaK1-0000vX-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 16:17:45 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EIaK0-0006jE-00; Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:44 -0600
To: 211159-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <E1EIaK0-0006jE-00@merkel.debian.org>
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:17:44 -0600
Delivered-To: 211159-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hello,

This is an automatic mail sent to close the ITP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your ITP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 365 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the ITP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 211159
thanks bts

Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
211159@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* ITPs when they reach one year of
inactivity.

A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Thu, 22 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500



Reply to: