[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#229376: marked as done (ITP: libperluno-perl -- UNO Perl Binding)

Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:03 -0600
with message-id <E1EICcJ-0004E8-00@merkel.debian.org>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2004 15:46:10 +0000
>From rene@rene-engelhard.de Sat Jan 24 07:46:10 2004
Return-path: <rene@rene-engelhard.de>
Received: from stan.ping.de [] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AkPz7-0006KE-00; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 07:46:10 -0800
Received: from rene by stan.ping.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AkPz5-0004Fz-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:46:07 +0100
X-IMAP-Sender: rene
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:27:06 +0100
X-OfflineIMAP-538256635-52656d6f7465-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1074959167-00476634822094
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: libperluno-perl -- UNO Perl Binding
Message-ID: <20040124152705.GA4732@rene-engelhard.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.39
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-GnuPG-Key: $ finger rene@db.debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/
Sender: Rene Engelhard <rene@rene-engelhard.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_20

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist

* Package name    : libperluno-perl
  Version         : 0.01
  Upstream Author : Bustamam Harun <bustamam at users.sourceforge.net>
* URL             : http://sourceforge.net/projects/perluno
* License         : LGPL / SISSL
  Description     : UNO Perl Binding

Description: UNO Perl Binding
 This is the Perl UNO brige allowing you to use the standard OpenOffice.org
  API from the well known perl scripting language.
  It addtionally allows to develop UNO components in perl, thus perl UNO
  components may be run within the office process and e.g. can be called
  from C++ or the built in StarBasic scripting language.

[ Will eventually go to experimental instead of unstable first.. -
  I could be packaged only after a openoffice.org-dev is ready and in
  the archive... ]

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frodo 2.4.24-rene #1 Do Jan 8 03:51:18 CET 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE@euro


 .''`.  Ren=E9 Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)



Received: (at 229376-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 21:59:04 +0000
>From damog@merkel.debian.org Wed Sep 21 14:59:04 2005
Return-path: <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Received: from merkel.debian.org [] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EICcK-0004b6-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:59:04 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EICcJ-0004E8-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:03 -0600
To: 229376-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closing
Message-Id: <E1EICcJ-0004E8-00@merkel.debian.org>
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@merkel.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:59:03 -0600
Delivered-To: 229376-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


This is an automatic mail sent to close the ITP you have reported or 
are involved with.

Your ITP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 450 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.

As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not 
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the ITP is still of your interest, or there has been 
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).

To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:

reopen 229376
thanks bts

Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
229376@bugs.debian.org would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.

This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive ITPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* ITPs when they reach one year of

A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.

Thanks for your cooperation,

 -- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>  Wed, 20 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500

Reply to: