Bug#255532: marked as done (RFP: svnutils -- Scripts and utilities useful for subversion)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:55 -0600
with message-id <E1EICe7-0004Yaemail@example.com>
and subject line WNPP bug closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jun 2004 16:56:59 +0000
>From firstname.lastname@example.org Mon Jun 21 09:56:59 2004
Received: from host252.extensibility.com (xerom.extensibility.com) [184.108.40.206]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BcS6N-000721-00; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:56:59 -0700
Received: by xerom.extensibility.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A28781202B; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:56:28 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Amelia A Lewis <email@example.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: RFP: svnutils -- Scripts and utilities useful for subversion
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:56:28 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
* Package name : svnutils
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Oyvind A. Holm <email@example.com>
* URL : http://svnutils.tigris.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Scripts and utilities useful for subversion
(from the website)
The goal of this project is to develop \u201cnice to have\u201d utilities
for use with the Subversion version control system. Commands and tasks you
do several times a day and want to automate or combine, wrappers around the
svn executable to extend built-in svn features, or other utilities for tasks
svn does not (yet) do.
If anyone have scripts or utilities they believe can be of use to others,
but maybe don\u2019t have the size of programs that usually have their own
packages, please contribute to the project and let\u2019s create a
collection of nice utilities for day-to-day use, hook scripts, libraries or
bigger programs for more complicated tasks. Instead of having lots of small
projects and scripts that never gets out of people\u2019s ~/bin directories,
all these programs can be merged into a powerful collection of useful
Examples of such tasks can be:
* Scripts for sorting and analyzing log messages.
* Extended history which also follows renames and deletions.
* Grab information from the repository or working copy.
* Easier editing of log messages.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Received: (at 255532-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 22:00:56 +0000
>From firstname.lastname@example.org Wed Sep 21 15:00:56 2005
Received: from merkel.debian.org [220.127.116.11] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICe8-0005J3-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:00:56 -0700
Received: from damog by merkel.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EICe7-0004Ya-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:55 -0600
Subject: WNPP bug closing
From: David Moreno Garza <email@example.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:00:55 -0600
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 450 days.
- It hasn't had any activity recently.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail firstname.lastname@example.org
with a body text like this:
Further comments on the work done in the bug sent to
email@example.com would be truly welcomed.
Anyway, if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <firstname.lastname@example.org>.
This is the second massive wnpp closing that is being done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 365 days and finally, an automatic
script will close, by default, *inactive* RFPs when they reach one year of
A similar process is being applied to other kind of wnpp bugs.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <email@example.com> Wed, 20 Sep 2005 17:06:42 -0500