Bug#184441: marked as done (RFP: sctl -- Solaris-compatible Thread Library)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025512.749F8107882@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Mar 2003 11:16:37 +0000
>From geg@iitb.fraunhofer.de Wed Mar 12 05:16:36 2003
Return-path: <geg@iitb.fraunhofer.de>
Received: from mailgw2.fhg.de (mailgw2.fraunhofer.de) [153.96.1.61]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18t4Dc-0004uD-00; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 05:16:25 -0600
Received: from mailgw2.fraunhofer.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailgw2.fraunhofer.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2CBG9617960
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:16:10 +0100 (MET)
Received: from kso.iitb.fhg.de (cmpm.iitb.fhg.de [153.96.8.2])
by mailgw2.fraunhofer.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2CBG8h17944
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:16:08 +0100 (MET)
Received: from iitb.fhg.de (iitb.iitb.fhg.de [153.96.12.2])
by kso.iitb.fhg.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h2CBG7v05226
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:16:07 +0100 (MET)
Received: from venus.ers.iitb.fhg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by iitb.fhg.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id h2CBG4A21487
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:16:04 +0100 (MET)
Received: from geg by venus.ers.iitb.fhg.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18t4DP-0000YA-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:16:07 +0100
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 12:16:06 +0100
From: Sven Geggus <Sven@gegg.us>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Solaris-compatible Thread Library (ScTL)
Message-ID: <20030312111602.GA2103@iitb.fhg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-giggls-priority: very high :P
Sender: Sven Geggus <geg@sol1.ers.iitb.fhg.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : sctl
Version : 1.1.0
* URL : http://sctl.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : Solaris-compatible Thread Library (ScTL)
The Solaris-compatible Thread Library (ScTL) is open-source software that
sits on top of a POSIX threads library and provides the Solaris threads
application programming interface (API). ScTL makes it easier to migrate
threaded Solaris applications to other UNIX-like platforms. An
otherwise-portable Solaris-threaded application could be simply recompiled
on another UNIX platform by using ScTL's header-files and libraries. Thus
ScTL avoids the need to convert the application to use the POSIX threads API
when it is being ported from Solaris.
Regards
Sven
--
"In the land of the brave and the free, we defend our freedom
with the GNU GPL" (Richard M. Stallman on www.gnu.org)
/me is giggls@ircnet, http://geggus.net/sven/ on the Web
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184441-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:44 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:44 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFjuZ-0001BW-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:44 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 749F8107882; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
To: 184441-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025512.749F8107882@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:12 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 184441-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 281
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
Reply to: