Bug#190184: marked as done (RFP: chandler -- personal information manager for email, calendars, contacts, tasks etc)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:13 -0500 (CDT)
with message-id <20050915025513.DBAA5107848@cerdita.damog.net>
and subject line WNPP bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2003 15:04:49 +0000
>From bas@o2w.nl Tue Apr 22 10:04:45 2003
Return-path: <bas@o2w.nl>
Received: from max.phys.uu.nl [131.211.32.73]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 197zK6-00083o-00; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:04:43 -0500
Received: from matilda.phys.uu.nl (matilda.phys.uu.nl [131.211.36.104])
by max.phys.uu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8BA5F43AE; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:04:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bas by matilda.phys.uu.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 197zK5-0002rK-00; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:04:41 +0200
From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ITP: chandler -- personal information manager for email, calendars, contacts, tasks etc
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:04:41 +0200
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <E197zK5-0002rK-00@matilda.phys.uu.nl>
Sender: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@o2w.nl>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,X_DEBBUGS_CC
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2003-04-22
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : chandler
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : general@osafoundation.org
* URL : http://www.osafoundation.org/our_product_desc.htm
* License : GPLv2
Description : personal information manager for email, calendars, contacts, tasks etc
>From the web site:
Our product (code-named "Chandler" after the great detective novelist Raymond
Chandler,) is a Personal Information Manager (PIM) intended for use in everyday
information and communication tasks, such as composing and reading email,
managing an appointment calendar and keeping a contact list. Because of the
ease with which Chandler users can share information with others, Chandler
might be called the first Interpersonal Information Manager. (The term PIM was
first used in conjunction with the product Lotus Agenda in the 1980's. Chandler
is the spiritual descendant of Agenda (and has a common designer in Mitch
Kapor.)
Recent open-source groupware products and projects (Evolution, Kroupware) use
Outlook as the baseline for design and functionality. This approach benefits
users because it's familiar, but it doesn't take design risks that could have
big payoffs for users in power and simplicity. We're trying to rethink the PIM
in fundamental ways and we expect to be judged in terms of our success in
achieving that goal. We're building the product by using up-to-date
architectural components such as peer-to-peer networking, integrated instant
messaging, and an RDF-compatible semantic database, and we're not saddled with
legacy code. At the same time, we'll be fully compliant with a variety of open
standards, such as iCal, vCard and the Jabber protocol.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0 with bunk-1 packages by Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux matilda 2.4.20-openmosix-1 #2 SMP Tue Mar 25 15:20:00 CET 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_IE@euro, LC_CTYPE=en_IE@euro
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 190184-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Sep 2005 02:55:49 +0000
>From damog@cerdita.damog.net Wed Sep 14 19:55:49 2005
Return-path: <damog@cerdita.damog.net>
Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx (cerdita.damog.net) [201.129.37.187]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EFjuf-0001Ks-00; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:55:49 -0700
Received: by cerdita.damog.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DBAA5107848; Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:13 -0500 (CDT)
To: 190184-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: WNPP bug closed
Message-Id: <20050915025513.DBAA5107848@cerdita.damog.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:55:13 -0500 (CDT)
From: damog@cerdita.damog.net (David Moreno Garza)
Delivered-To: 190184-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,VALID_BTS_CONTROL
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 328
Hello,
This is an automatic mail sent to close the RFP you have reported or
are involved with.
Your RFP wnpp bug is being closed because of the following reasons:
- It is, as of today, older than 600 days.
- It haven't had any activity recently.
- The amount of ITPs on the Debian BTS is huge and we need to
clean up a bit the place.
As this an automatic procedure, it could of course have something
wrong and probably it would be closing some bugs that are not
intended by owners and submitters (like you) to be closed, for
example if the RFP is still of your interest, or there has been
some kind of activity around it. In that case, please reopen the
bug, do it, DO IT NOW! (I don't want to be blamed because of
mass closing and not let people know that they can easily reopen
their bugs ;-).
To re-open it, you simply have to mail control@bugs.debian.org
with a body text like this:
reopen 123456
thanks bts
Replacing '123456' for the number of your RFP bug. The subject of the
mail is ignored. Or if you have any kind of problems when dealing with
the BTS, feel free to contact me and I'd be more than happy to help
you on this: <damog@debian.org>.
This is the first mass wnpp closing that will be done. The next close
will be done on inactive RFPs older than 450 days and finally, the
ones older than 365 days (an automatic script will close *inactive*
RFPs when they reach one year old).
A similar process is being applied to the ITP wnpp bugs in these
days.
Thanks for your cooperation,
-- David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> Wed, 14 Sep 2005 21:54:42 -0500
Reply to: